Jump to content
Security Installer Community

james.wilson

Admin
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    30,642

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    287

 Content Type 

Everything posted by james.wilson

  1. james.wilson
    I disagree I'd lock it, but would charge to unlock. But would reset it for free if the board was dropped off. It's not to lock in a customer it's to protect the company from malicious claims. I'd assume the outgoing firm would do something similar
  2. james.wilson
    Kat?
  3. james.wilson
    you should always chnage default codes. So id assume you did
  4. james.wilson
    If you swap the bell and strobe terminals in the panel does the bell sound and the strobe not activate?
  5. james.wilson
    Just give it power only and meter the alarm relay. However if the led is staying on I'd say its goosed
  6. james.wilson
    Happy.christmas Bear in mind this forum is funded by security professionals. I hope the free advice has helped
  7. james.wilson
    Alan it will need a service I'm not saying you can't do it yourself but if you never service it will fail at some point. Do some preventative checks
  8. james.wilson
    This should always been changed leaving anything with default codes is a huge risk on a system designed to be secure. All systems need to be serviced or they will eventually fail, usually at 2am etc
  9. james.wilson
    id assume you havnt got the lid on correcrtly or you have damaged the tamper switch. You have done nothing else but remove the lid of the panel? its also going to need a service even if you do it yourself
  10. james.wilson
    Regarding ha texecom have the lead. That's a hack but imagine if a proper panel supported it
  11. james.wilson
    Don't know the panel but I'd attempt to save it.
  12. james.wilson
    no not poor design just different ages and ways of doing it. you cant just write of all the gear for 1 reason. same issues with gals for instance. they afaik dont offer remote flashing. look at all things from that era, redcares and old (pre ww1) couldnt be upgraded remotely. eaton i think can but not scanny 9800 etc
  13. james.wilson
    correct the hkc panel downloads the firmware image checks it then overwrites. So if it fails half way through etc it ignores the upload. I think the texecom does a direct write so if it fails half way through it bricks. Other gear is like that too it depends how much storage space is available and id say the firmware file on the texecom is larger than the hkc as the panels are more than 240 circuits
  14. james.wilson
    yeah as above i think it copies straight to the memory, possibly because the flash hasnt the room for 2 copies of firmware
  15. james.wilson
    Seems a popular topic?
  16. james.wilson
    Well resolved
  17. james.wilson
    Agreed you do need to get up to it and remove it
  18. james.wilson
    Hello and welcome
  19. james.wilson
    be cautious what you choose and avoid the diy ones
  20. james.wilson
    No he is removing old pointless stuff in favour of ring. Hi BTW glad your here
  21. james.wilson
    be interesting if it is the ac noise and the 1313 would of cured?
  22. james.wilson
    the veritas is a budget panel, maybe the driver isnt as powerful as the one taken out?
  23. james.wilson
    yes it s the smoothing cap, do you have a scope to check the supply, is the cap bulging?
  24. james.wilson
    look at the latest npcc force policy. however it will probabky become mandatory for installers but isnt yet. Plus my vote on comitee currently is i want a documemt that has some industry input. cyber essentials does not and has little to do with intruder alarms and alarm companies. i say little not nothing.
  25. james.wilson
    Hi Scott Im afraid the above quote isnt 100% true. Previous force policy had this as a requirment but is now optional. You may also want to look at the bsia scheme CySPAG
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

  I accept