james.wilson Posted May 13, 2013 Share Posted May 13, 2013 And enhanced polling, better encryption and lots more. But dualtec is optional securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnealon Posted May 13, 2013 Share Posted May 13, 2013 I'm not sure if this product ever came to market as i dont know anyone that sold it or installed it. They did launch some grade 2 kit recently. guys were ex act afaik www.realsecurity.ie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cubit Posted May 13, 2013 Share Posted May 13, 2013 I'm not sure if this product ever came to market as i dont know anyone that sold it or installed it. They did launch some grade 2 kit recently. guys were ex act afaik Main man was, Peter O'Conner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxo Posted May 13, 2013 Share Posted May 13, 2013 No requirement for dualtecs at grade 3. Check your copy of 50131 arf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arfur mo Posted May 13, 2013 Share Posted May 13, 2013 No requirement for dualtecs at grade 3. Check your copy of 50131 arf manufacture of wireless detectors and controls to comply with APCO & EN standards is currently outside of my remit . but when i get 5 minutes............ lol! It's always easier to get power to detectors than it is data, anyway. agreed, using that emphasis, other power hungry needs could be catered for in a sort of hybrid setup. implementation of better encryption should not be barrier imho If you think education is difficult, try being stupid!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arfur mo Posted May 13, 2013 Share Posted May 13, 2013 And enhanced polling, better encryption and lots more. But dualtec is optional likely a throw away remark on an IFSEC stand or when waiting in a suppliers trade counter. perhaps, i had assumed because you can't have even quads crossing over their detection areas, and yet dual-tecs are allowed (or one of if each), your safer to use dual-tec throughout for G3. at least i'd be exceeding compliance requirements using all iWise DT's, so i have no real issues to worry about. If you think education is difficult, try being stupid!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxo Posted May 13, 2013 Share Posted May 13, 2013 Apart from the understanding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrHappy Posted May 13, 2013 Share Posted May 13, 2013 i had assumed because you can't have even quads crossing over their detection areas, IIRC Acpo thing ? Mr Veritas God Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matthew.brough Posted May 13, 2013 Share Posted May 13, 2013 IIRC Acpo thing ? Yes, no overlapping of same technology except for dt's. www.securitywarehouse.co.uk/catalog/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cubit Posted May 13, 2013 Share Posted May 13, 2013 Yes, no overlapping of same technology except for dt's. Here's one for you intruder buffs then. Entry/Exit door. Two door contacts in series, tampered and butt up to each other. On police response. Any Reason why this would be done? I have my suspicions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.