Jump to content
Security Installer Community

sixwheeledbeast

Global Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    8,751

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    143

 Content Type 

Everything posted by sixwheeledbeast

  1. sixwheeledbeast
    Would facilitate more cowboy jobs IMO.
  2. sixwheeledbeast
    A now blunt 4.5mm HSS bit makes a tidy job of that if I need to.
  3. sixwheeledbeast
    Yep. No but it's new. Really? Was that the side by side catastrophic failure test?
  4. sixwheeledbeast
    If it works? Plenty of Racal's, pad's and foil knocking about on maintenance here. Talking of blast from the past check out this playlist...
  5. sixwheeledbeast
    3.77 It still not clear, but they seem to be all the same hardware. You can buy spare units and program them to be whatever grade you need. Completely agree.
  6. sixwheeledbeast
    I guess it depends on what your calling CS2300-R. Take your ebay example this shows a "CS2300-R" but the product part number is CS2412. It doesn't seem easy to tell which products your vulnerabilities relate to from these CS numbers.
  7. sixwheeledbeast
    They are powered from a common supply and fuse anyway.
  8. sixwheeledbeast
    Err, well unless on engineer reset, no.
  9. sixwheeledbeast
    Have you reset the system? It's possible the battery charging circuit is faulty or has a blown fuse.
  10. sixwheeledbeast
    The negative posts are obviously from individual experience. To each there own, not one panel will suit all installers for one reason or another. Some of the positives you mention are negatives for others.
  11. sixwheeledbeast
    I assumed standard practice for CR's. After a number of 18-23 month failures you realise it's not worth testing them.
  12. sixwheeledbeast
    It's 20 years old and most likely never been serviced in years get the system decommissioned or upgraded.
  13. sixwheeledbeast
    A shed full of servers will do then?
  14. sixwheeledbeast
    This is a fair point who wires plug tops to there new goods any more. The difference I suppose is isolation and competence, plugged in equipment can be isolated easily and without being competent. Arguments aside did you not get your answers to your three questions in post 2?
  15. sixwheeledbeast
    0.75mm flex is rated to 6A.
  16. sixwheeledbeast
    So you reading PM's now or not
  17. sixwheeledbeast
    Follow the manufacturers instructions and choose the best position with that as a guide. Post 2 was generic so advise would be the same upstairs.
  18. sixwheeledbeast
    You need to contact your installer.
  19. sixwheeledbeast
    It's double NAT'ed by the sounds of things. If this is the case there are a few ways to resolve. Remove NAT from one device. Correctly configure the NAT to stagger through the deivces. Or worse case option is to DMZ the first NAT device (useful to check for double NAT)
  20. sixwheeledbeast
    If red is radiators then SW would not be facing windows from your diagram. However, I did say that the plan doesn't help. They cover 90 degree so it can be a waste in flat.
  21. sixwheeledbeast
    Facing away but across any windows would be best. Both to reduce the chance of sunlight issues and cover the potential break in points better. Adjacent a radiator could be an issue whereas facing one on a wall opposite would be less so. You could also fit DT's instead if there are concerns with FA's The plan doesn't give the full picture but SW corners?
  22. sixwheeledbeast
    Use what the manufacturers recommend. I agree, would use Belden for RS485, that's what it's designed for.
  23. sixwheeledbeast
    Cost hight? Definitely biased
  24. sixwheeledbeast
    never installed one but it sounds like something that should be in the user guide.
  25. sixwheeledbeast
    Sometimes the weight issue is more to do with how balanced the drill is. If the battery is at the front it can feel twice as heavy as others.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

  I accept