sjsturner Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 It's clear that care in one aspect (protocol design) carries through to things like PCB design, case design, and better usability. I wish Visonic would respond on the FHSS limitations, as it makes a pretty good system much weaker. Scanny ion? Where does that fall? Or is that the one you describe as "bad"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
datadiffusion Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Scanny ion? Where does that fall? Or is that the one you describe as "bad"? Just thinking that.... So, I've decided to take my work back underground.... to stop it falling into the wrong hands Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybergibbons Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Both silence and confirmation would be quite damning. Take a look at this: http://sitsec.net/files/secvest_analysis.pdf And see who makes it, and that it isn't massively different to the Friedland system. I have a blog, some of which is about alarm security and reverse engineering:http://cybergibbons.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjsturner Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 I havent got all night cyber!! So bascically ion is sh1t? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybergibbons Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 I don't rate it, especially alongside other systems. It feels like an old system with some fluff on top. I have a blog, some of which is about alarm security and reverse engineering:http://cybergibbons.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjsturner Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Ok fair enough. I know scanny boasted long range with their kit, saying free air was reliable to something like 4 kilometers iirc. Are you saying the transmission of rf is like friedland or the encription side of it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james.wilson Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 See this is what we need. Good info cg. Be good to see a review on the security aspects of kit imo. I did look at timing issues etc with signalling devices but us installers cannot test to the level you do. securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjsturner Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 See this is what we need. Good info cg. Be good to see a review on the security aspects of kit imo. I did look at timing issues etc with signalling devices but us installers cannot test to the level you do. Qfa Very interesting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lwillis Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 I've fitted a few of the scanny ions , was a few years ago now . Thought the end station was huge for what it needed to be. Rkp was quite modern tho. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james.wilson Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 but the usual engineer approval note of 'havnt had any issues' is making a few think im sure now about their kit choices securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.