Jump to content
Security Installer Community

Replacement Alarm / Sab


Rekusu

Recommended Posts

It's clear that care in one aspect (protocol design) carries through to things like PCB design, case design, and better usability.

I wish Visonic would respond on the FHSS limitations, as it makes a pretty good system much weaker.

Scanny ion?

Where does that fall?

Or is that the one you describe as "bad"?

Both silence and confirmation would be quite damning.

 

Take a look at this:

http://sitsec.net/files/secvest_analysis.pdf

 

And see who makes it, and that it isn't massively different to the Friedland system.

I have a blog, some of which is about alarm security and reverse engineering:
http://cybergibbons.com/

 

 

 

Ok fair enough.

I know scanny boasted long range with their kit, saying free air was reliable to something like 4 kilometers iirc.

Are you saying the transmission of rf is like friedland or the encription side of it?

See this is what we need. Good info cg.

Be good to see a review on the security aspects of kit imo. I did look at timing issues etc with signalling devices but us installers cannot test to the level you do.

securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse

Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount.

See this is what we need. Good info cg.

Be good to see a review on the security aspects of kit imo. I did look at timing issues etc with signalling devices but us installers cannot test to the level you do.

Qfa

Very interesting

but the usual engineer approval note of 'havnt had any issues' is making a few think im sure now about their kit choices

securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse

Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.