The Sunwin one looks cack.

The Sunwin one looks cack.

Webb's look ok

Taken from above website.

http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/326679.pdf

"Advertisements in the form of price tickets or markers, trade-names on branded goods, or displayed on petrol pumps or vending machines.

These advertisements must not be illuminated, nor exceed 0.1 square metres in area"

Edited February 7, 201115 yr by sixwheeledbeast

Why call it an advertisement?

Nothing more than contact details.

Does a backlit bellbox on residential need planning permission?

from what i know yes it does

any back-lit 'sign' needs planning. I assume thats why the risco equivalent id 'front' lit?

but id still agree that angus's looked good

Tat. No one gives a toss, its only us lot in the trade who actually notice bells.

As above - well put

Arfur

from what i know yes it does

any back-lit 'sign' needs planning. I assume thats why the risco equivalent id 'front' lit?

but id still agree that angus's looked good

Do no logo = not a sign = no planning permission needed?

Lucky Christ was not born this Century - David's star would not meet planning regs it part 'P' .

Arfur

//to save Norman - unfortunately AM was//

Edited February 7, 201115 yr by arfur mo

I'd agree but it's only an opinion that no logo = no sign

I think back lit bells are chavy.

I think back lit bells are chavy.

fitted one to try out for builder. he got us to swap for normal for that reason.