Jump to content
Security Installer Community

Recommended Posts

Your question isnt clear but I guess you are asking about connecting the fire alarm to the access control to release the doors when the fire alarm goes off.

 

To be compliant you should wire them in series with the locks not into the controller, they should in the event of a fire drop the power to the lock as default. If you wire them to an input on the Paxton and programming the paxton to release the doors, then you are reliant on the Paxton kit working when a fire breaks out which then means the Paxton has to be compliant to BS5839 which its not  

  • Upvote 1

You could do it all with one on Paxton but as pointed out it wouldn't conform.

Should be an interface local to each door breaking the power directly like with local emergency door releases.

Can't rely on the controller or the access network in case it FTO

 

  • Upvote 1
2 hours ago, David Walsh said:

Thank you. What do you mean locks not in the controller? 

What do you think it means? Think about what you are trying to achieve and then ask yourself that question again.

On 31/03/2023 at 18:00, David Walsh said:

Thank you. What do you mean locks not in the controller? 

As a newbie or chancer as some might say

 

I assuming you need to fit something in-between the lock and the controller , this way controller has no choice that doors are released ???

Al drop the chancher bit, your asking, if you cant ask with some positive feedback tsi is dead.

As Pete says the fire overide needs to be at each head droping the power to each lock as part of the fire not a network intruction

 

I was handed mine earier today as functional earths need a different colour I need to get back in the ring

 

securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse

Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount.

It's usually down to who controls what tho.

Who will commission the fire etc.

I would always expect one for one unless told and confirmed in writing otherwise.

You want to minimise the length of the runs from the fire system and also minimise failures if there is an issue with the loop.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.