goncall Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 And tested each time it is used !! it could be tested daily,hourly, ever second of the day if required..have alot of local authority sites with the scany lw for caretakers,gives pa and man down signals which complies with the lone worker ra's they require.simple but works Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norman Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 I would have thought polling on a professional lone worker system would be a no brainer Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james.wilson Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 it could be tested daily,hourly, ever second of the day if required. id say it was. Without the backend to support the units then may as well be relying on an sms from the lone worker. securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goncall Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 I would have thought polling on a professional lone worker system would be a no brainer it would,but he wants something that meets his ras,plenty things will do just that,im sure we all protect our employees with state of the art lone working systems dont we.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james.wilson Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 we do but they are not sd1 based securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matthew.brough Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 yes it would but its not a system designed for the purpose. Its an intruder alarm that can do x. My point was that as an industry its a jack of all trades, master of none. Lone working is a specialist job on its own imo. lets hope thats oftn enough. the days of 'it worked fine guv when i last tested it' have gone. especially from an insurance point of view. Quite agree. www.securitywarehouse.co.uk/catalog/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goncall Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 we do but they are not sd1 based so how do you protect your lads on call? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james.wilson Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 we have a system and apps that are managed by our arc when they are passed a call. securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxo Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 it would,but he wants something that meets his ras,plenty things will do just that,im sure we all protect our employees with state of the art lone working systems dont we.. LOL, the times I could have fallen and no one would have known!! Been in a crash. I think we have all been there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goncall Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 LOL, the times I could have fallen and no one would have known!! Been in a crash. I think we have all been there. we all still do ox,lone working is the next ppi,theres no hard and fast rules,just the ras of that job,we as an industry are at risk due the hours we do and the situations we find ourselves in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.