goncall Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 Unless its been butchered before hand, I can't think of any need to have bolts visible outside ? depends on the type of shutter,bolted thru many a time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlie6 Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 I'd go with you on that one goncall. But back to the external beam regs, If the roller shutter is not protruding onto a public highway (space etc.) and is on enclosed private land wouldn't it be better to 'catch' the intruder before he decides to demolish the roller shutter ? What are the regs on this ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdrianMealing Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 I'd go with you on that one goncall. But back to the external beam regs, If the roller shutter is not protruding onto a public highway (space etc.) and is on enclosed private land wouldn't it be better to 'catch' the intruder before he decides to demolish the roller shutter ? What are the regs on this ? Simple, the detection must be inside the supervised premises as defined in the standards. Quote amealing@texe.com Head of Industry Affairs Visit Our Website Texecom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goncall Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 I'd go with you on that one goncall. But back to the external beam regs, If the roller shutter is not protruding onto a public highway (space etc.) and is on enclosed private land wouldn't it be better to 'catch' the intruder before he decides to demolish the roller shutter ? What are the regs on this ? dont know off hand but external protection signalled on a different channel from memory Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james.wilson Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 you cant have devices outside the perimeter. Also i insist on bolts as self tapping fitting over the years work loose and come off. Bolts show damage etc and hold on longer dont know off hand but external protection signalled on a different channel from memory You could do this but you cant have it as part of the confirm process Quote securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goncall Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 You could do this but you cant have it as part of the confirm process i know hence the different channel,either keyholder or guarding co responce only Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
9651 Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 (edited) also is there such a thing as a graded active beam?? On a few compounds we do, seperate group, keyholder only. Ive even got one running optex rednets on seperate channels per beam. Works well Edited June 9, 2015 by 9651 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james.wilson Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 i know hence the different channel,either keyholder or guarding co responce only yes also is there such a thing as a graded active beam?? g2 yes Quote securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
9651 Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 yes g2 yes Who by? I'm sure optex dont? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goncall Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 yes im harking back to 4737 here mind when there was plenty spare channels on a redcare,armbell on garden centre fences was the main culprit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.