Sparky2008 Posted July 30, 2012 Author Share Posted July 30, 2012 In my dealings the SSAIB are very good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparky2008 Posted July 30, 2012 Author Share Posted July 30, 2012 It would appear that DPR Secure have modified their site, Trustmark Removed All monitored systems installed by SSAIB approved contractors. added above the SSAIB Logo Brochure Claiming approval absent DPR Letting have removed all logo of website, but not brochure DPR Ltd still showing the Trustmark ect... Well its a step forward Not good enough. They are not approved period and are not allowed to display the SSAIB logo, they still say they are a fully accredited installer. What do they mean fully accredited? The public seeing this and the SSAIB logo will assume they are therefore SSAIB accredited. They also only state above their logo "monitored systems fitted by approved subcontractors" What about non monitored systems then. My blood is boiling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cubit Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 And I can confirm gas safe are now on their case. Companies can only use the logo if the company itself is registered, Perhaps they'll now be telling all their landlords they've done work now have a potential legal problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james.wilson Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 I suppose gas safe and trustmark will be the big legal powers? securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norman Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 TBF at least they are doing something? Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cubit Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 I suppose gas safe and trustmark will be the big legal powers? Yep. Ago doing you go do anything silly like delete the Directors admission that he did indeed use them. Pulling the logos now is a bit late. Perhaps the two fcktards who posted insane comments in his defence may now wish they'd contacted him rather than add fuel to the fire. Staff eh . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james.wilson Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 i wouldnt say staff id say a bit higher securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronnie Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 fcktards I love that word.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itesecurity Posted July 30, 2012 Share Posted July 30, 2012 They have paused their adwords account also. Not showing in sponsored results when you search CCTV Leeds anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparky2008 Posted July 30, 2012 Author Share Posted July 30, 2012 Yes deff higher. I think the director should still babe coming back on here to say why he thinks it's correct to display a logo without his company having it. I notice his page still states they will soon be getting SSAIB approval. I think he is in dream land, the SSAIB will not give him approval after doing what he has. In my opinion he is a poor company director, I would call him a muppett They have paused their adwords account also. Not showing in sponsored results when you search CCTV Leeds anymore. No they have not still there, just bottom of page 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.