alarmcom

the danger with your meeting is that the attendees will have their own agenda which may not neccaseraly represent the interests of the majority of this industry.

Most already do. Its normally in the programming options. My suggestion is even easier for manufacturers.

These statements are surely at odds: BSI’s ambition is that the UK should continue to participate in the European Standardization System as a full member of CEN, CENELEC and ETSI. We consider that this is a likely outcome of the forthcoming negotiations between the UK and the EU. I will certainly do my best in the coming months to deliver this ambition, in the interests of UK industry, government and society. Were coming out, the majority system has spoken. Screw the EU standards which even after 10 years + of people trying to get square pegs in round holes the wise concede don't work as a STANDARD. Its not so difficult to move forward without EU bureaucracy. My draft solution would be to start again with a G1 = DIY, G2= pro system (similar to 4737) that starts at a higher level than the G2 currently in place but would encompasses greater levels of protection in line with the risk. eg. anti mask in defined areas and single/dual path and higher poling rates all based on risk. Simple is workable.

Daughter? Still in the industry I think we will be using the kit she's selling.