I feel your still incorrect in the way you interpreted my questions.
It was asked , well look back and see.
I mentioned he was "defending" himself too much. Quite as I am doing now from your comments.
See the comparison?
If the equipment is as good as mentioned then it might kill off certain DIY tat that is next to useless.
I would mention names , but this would then leave this site open to litigation. But you know the Response from an associated Harvard (If you cannot work out the connection, don`t worry) ..........are totally different.
So if this IS able to be graded, as stated and the prices reduced then it could be viable in the market.
There was no need to be insulting to anyone, as the case seems to be here at the moment. I certainly was not.
Mentioning being too defensive is not an insult.
You are of course right to point this out. Perhaps you can use this insight in other threads to assist others being attacked?