cybergibbons Posted June 29, 2013 Share Posted June 29, 2013 I think each alarm manufacturer should have a vulnerability and issue reporting policy. If the problem isn't responded to or isn't fixed, then it goes public. Failures out of the box shouldn't happen often these days. I have a blog, some of which is about alarm security and reverse engineering:http://cybergibbons.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrHappy Posted June 29, 2013 Share Posted June 29, 2013 If Jef's trade only, why can he post in public ? Mr Veritas God Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jb-eye Posted June 29, 2013 Author Share Posted June 29, 2013 If Jef's trade only, why can he post in public ?i can't post in public. Just checked there is something very wrong here. A lot of what I want to post in I can't and this stuff I would prefer not to be public as I can see it getting nasty. I can only defend my position by not allowing them in the public domain. Customers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norman Posted June 29, 2013 Share Posted June 29, 2013 I can only defend my position by not allowing them in the public domain.not sure I follow? Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james.wilson Posted June 29, 2013 Share Posted June 29, 2013 Aaron had this issue too. Ill look again. i however think it should be public. Just the same as I.T. Their stuff protects far more value than we do securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.