james.wilson Posted October 27, 2012 Share Posted October 27, 2012 We had a discussion recently about grading etc and i wrongly stated there was an application standard that prescribes things in some detail. However we have decided not to adopt this. The point i was discussing was the following As you can see this makes it simple like 5839 imo securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jb-eye Posted October 27, 2012 Share Posted October 27, 2012 Thus deleting the post would unmuddy the subject ? Customers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james.wilson Posted October 27, 2012 Author Share Posted October 27, 2012 you lost me? securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterJames Posted October 27, 2012 Share Posted October 27, 2012 I think what james it trying to say is that L1 L2 L3 are all specific to what you install in 5839, and now they have done something similar with 50131 only James (like most of us will) has decided not to adopt the minimum requirements. Is that about it James? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james.wilson Posted October 27, 2012 Author Share Posted October 27, 2012 Its not my decision the uk has decided not to adopt the reg. Id like too but with a few changes of course. Its all about design, installation, documentation and service etc. Theres a lot of stuff to like in it imho securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jb-eye Posted October 27, 2012 Share Posted October 27, 2012 Its not my decision the uk has decided not to adopt the reg. Id like too but with a few changes of course. Its all about design, installation, documentation and service etc. Theres a lot of stuff to like in it imho Here li my point. It's may appear a good idea but it's not a reg so no point in muddying the waters with an irelavence Customers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james.wilson Posted October 27, 2012 Author Share Posted October 27, 2012 i can see that jef, but as you are imo part of the grade 2 that will do brigade, surly this brigs some legislation to the current mad consensus that is again imho wrong? securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jb-eye Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 i can see that jef, but as you are imo part of the grade 2 that will do brigade, surly this brigs some legislation to the current mad consensus that is again imho wrong? You may well have a good point but as its not a reg your opinion is mute Customers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alterEGO Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 Lol Jef. For whats its worth James I think you made it clear that the UK have decided against it. You seem to just be trying to gage opinion on the theory behind it. As you say it would need to be clear on how they expect detection to be implemented. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronnie Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 should make it easier for end users to compare like for like in theory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.