Oxo Posted August 4, 2012 Share Posted August 4, 2012 I meant to say may I thank you to long timer for his comments Oxo will be fine Christ its paul Yep, your call. Well said Paul & welcome back : Andy Thanks mate Nice to see you here BTW And to you mate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Engcode1745 Posted August 4, 2012 Share Posted August 4, 2012 Hot news, just been informed SSAIB have asked for images removed, which as from 5pm today they have now been removed. Images now missing off DPR site Good bye Jim take care and hopefully meet up soon mate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrHappy Posted August 4, 2012 Share Posted August 4, 2012 Good bye Jim take care and hopefully meet up soon mate. Shaun, whilst to the untrained eye the forum may be thought to contain anonymous posters, it ain't "Jim" Mr Veritas God Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cubit Posted August 4, 2012 Share Posted August 4, 2012 Shaun, whilst to the untrained eye the forum may be thought to contain anonymous posters, it ain't "Jim" And doesn't that just make a complete mockery of the comments by the the numpty claiming to be the Marketing Director. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alterEGO Posted August 4, 2012 Share Posted August 4, 2012 What a stain on our industry this shower of sh¡te are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterJames Posted August 4, 2012 Share Posted August 4, 2012 DPR need to understand that the security industry is based around trust, and as such those that work in this industry will not stand by and watch dishonest people come along and abuse the system for those of us that have worked honestly and dammed hard I would like to think that DPR have learnt a lesson from this experience, however, I see little evidence that they have. And if what they say about the discussions with SSAIB is true (And I sincerly hope that its not) I see little evidence that SSAIB have learnt anything from it either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Engcode1745 Posted August 4, 2012 Share Posted August 4, 2012 http://www.fmb.org.uk/check-a-member/default.aspx TRUSTMARK approved for the installation of security/alarm systems Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cubit Posted August 4, 2012 Share Posted August 4, 2012 http://www.fmb.org.u...er/default.aspx TRUSTMARK approved for the installation of security/alarm systems And Gas Safe? Oh, You don't have it. No bragging rights after all eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrHappy Posted August 4, 2012 Share Posted August 4, 2012 http://www.fmb.org.u...er/default.aspx TRUSTMARK approved for the installation of security/alarm systems Currently what I assume to be your very recent inclusion within the Trustmark scheme is yet to filter though onto the Trustmark website This are the results showing for Security Systems nearest DPR's postcode I would expect the more prudent member will look sometime during the week to confirm what scope is listed for your trustmark Mr Veritas God Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cubit Posted August 4, 2012 Share Posted August 4, 2012 Currently what I assume to be your very recent inclusion within the Trustmark scheme is yet to filter though onto the Trustmark website This are the results showing for Security Systems nearest DPR's postcode I would expect the more prudent member will look sometime during the week to confirm what scope is listed for your trustmark You couldn't make this up, you really couldn't. What a bunch of shysters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.