Jump to content
Security Installer Community

Melcom St6100 - Rewire Or Replace Tomorrow?


Simon K

Recommended Posts

Bumping this question - am wiring up the resistors on the detectors at the mo, do I need to do them on the Panic Buttons too or will there be some way to disable EOL for just those zones?  (I can't seem to find one by reading the programming instructions but possibly I'm missing something...)

no option by zone, all zones are used with resistors, detectors might come with link selectable resistors on board.

keypad has pab option selected in programming, tbh if you feel you need pab, i really recommend get a registered company (i'm not one) in for Police response needs, or might as well buy a rape alarm otherwise.

not withstanding, personally if putting pab upstairs, i always suggest a keypad instead. gives convenient use at bedtime/when off sick, as well as pab feature, thats not so easy to operate by the curious.

If you think education is difficult, try being stupid!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

None of the above Imo mate.

ok new question tell me in any way with any product where risco lead?

LOOKS!

but to play your game, when did Ford ever better BMW or Mercedes, but people still buy far more Fords, so your point(less) being made is............

i'm not one to bolluck the site owner - often, but is this side discussion solely aimed at sniping Risco products really needed when trying help a public visitor?

i ssk was it me who even suggested Risco? was it me who even suggested the CPX (G600 would be my choice).

i said (and nobody else did), due to existing susoect wiring issues, consider a panel with end of line resistors,

the choice of which the O/P has made himself - so perhaps Risco is like Ford, fit for the purpose required (it rings a bleeding siren on detection), he has no need of zillions of zones, 5000 keyholders etc etc. as he is not looking after Ford or Fort Nox (afiak), and can potentially instal it himself

which with full respects to a knowledgeable and able o/p, he would find much harder with your fanzine choice of panel (and/or the ProSys).

shish! horsed for courses come to mind.

If you think education is difficult, try being stupid!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i ssk was it me who even suggested Risco? was it me who even suggested the CPX (G600 would be my choice).

i said (and nobody else did), due to existing susoect wiring issues, consider a panel with end of line resistors,

the choice of which the O/P has made himself - so perhaps Risco is like Ford, fit for the purpose required (it rings a bleeding siren on detection), he has no need of zillions of zones, 5000 keyholders etc etc. as he is not looking after Ford or Fort Nox (afiak), and can potentially instal it himself

 

Actually you did suggest the Risco Gardtec CPX - on page 2 of this topic, it was the only panel you suggested.  I looked around for others which were also DEOL but couldn't find any, so bought the one suggested.  That said, I'm fine with it - I just need something better than the Melcom which I can install myself.  I'm even going to connect up its voice dialler (I have two phone lines at home, I'll leave the SD2 on one and connect this up to the second).  So all said -- enough discussion of the panel, unless you guys really want to :-)

 

Now an actual DIY installation question.  I have ripped out the old alarm and made good as much as I can the existing wiring, which was a horrible mess.  There was no consistency on the colours used, so the tamper circuit was blues connected to oranges connected to greens, and the power was a multicoloured bunch.  Not fun, and in addition it was an impossible mess, but now tidied up and made consistent.  I have the new box on the wall with all wires fed through, and the wiring all connected for the bell-box, RKP, internal sounder and power.  I'm now working on connecting up the zones, and installing the detectors one by one.

 

Since EOL wiring is new to me, I put one of the detectors on individually to understand how it works.  The detector is an Intellisense DT-725D (I have Five of these dual-tech ones and two simpler unbranded PIRs).  I have given power to V+/V-, and I have blue on one Tamper, then a 4k7 connecting to alarm C, a 6k8 bridging alarm C to alarm NC, and green going back from alarm NC.  I have my Fluke 87-5 connected to green and blue in the panel measuring resistance.  When the tamper is good (cover closed), I see a constant 11k5 Ohms (well 11.493 but within tolerance), irrespective of whether the detector has detected movement or not.  The detector is clearly working - the LED lights up when movement is detected - however the reading on the end of the cables doesn't change.

 

I was expecting it to show 4k7 when the zone is secure (since the alarm connection should be closed), and 11k5 when the sensor triggers detection.  Is that correct?  What have I done wrong?

 

-simon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a photo of how it is wired (ignore the white/blue and white/green at the bottom, they're spares and will be tidied up).  When tamper is activated I get 0Ohms as expected.

 

I've tested the resistance between the connections and it seems correct.

 

Any thoughts?

 

mh8rhu.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, just got round to looking at that.  The Alarm Pair are never actually closed, even when the LED goes off.  So the sensor is faulty?  Seems very odd to me - it was working previously with the earlier alarm (we were getting false alarms, but the alarm was able to set - if this sensor wasn't working then it wouldn't have set?).  Maybe I broke it somehow...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes you will need resistors in every device fitted to a zone.

Seen it where door contacts and pir's have failed in the'closed position, customers never walk test, never have it serviced, and would also never have a detection on those zones, but apparently the system is fine because it sets ok!.

A little knowledge and no servicing can possibly cause dispute on insurance claims if the alarm failed to perform through faults that should have been dealt with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

James - the terminals were like that :-| both the tamper and the alarm terminals were at a funny angle.  I'm only going to finger-tight (I'm not good with mechanics but I ride a motorcycle and am used to being light where I need to if I don't have a small torque wrench).  But yeah, I think possibly when the original sparky connected up he over-tightened, then when I loosened and tightened again...

 

Will take it off the wall and look, at worst I guess I'll just buy another.  For now am getting on with the others (which do correctly close the NC connection :-)

 

-simon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.