new requirement in 50131-7

Whats the 'Phycological effects on the client' bit about?

Bit like flogging Basil Fawty an austin 1100.

Nothing wrong with an Austin 1100, Redbull has one....

Thats a 1300, without hubcaps.

Thats a 1300, without hubcaps.

Knew he used photoshop on that pic...........

crikey don't go risco - big fail rate there

I would go Homelink55-K or i-on16

Have Had no problems with these - the 55K will give you more areas to set/unset, the i-on gives you a full set and part set

crikey don't go risco - big fail rate there

We have very few faults with risco, what faults have you had?

as above id disagree. Good yes... best no

bar the fact you use galaxy as a rule, what on the wireless side is any better then risco?

crikey don't go risco - big fail rate there

I would go Homelink55-K or i-on16

Have Had no problems with these - the 55K will give you more areas to set/unset, the i-on gives you a full set and part set

The homelink is a terrible panel and Risco beats it hands down but the new I-on16 is a very good panel.

Risco has no big fail rate imo!

We have very few faults with risco, what faults have you had?

bar the fact you use galaxy as a rule, what on the wireless side is any better then risco?

galaxy g2 best for range and stability

visonic best for peripherals.

diatem best for low power and wireless dt.

diatem best for low power and wireless dt.

Have you used the diatem is it reliable?