Jump to content
Security Installer Community

Cubit

Trade ONLY
  • Posts

    6,970
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

Posts posted by Cubit

  1. They are not obliged to send you the phot's unless you plead not guilty and elect a court appearance, the you will get them with the evidence pack in due course.

     

    You can aslk them for the photo to assist you in identifying the driver but they are not obliged to divvy it up.....and clock continues to tick on the 28 day time limit to return the S172

  2. The M6/M42 sector is notorious for this.

    Yes, there is a delay but no one quite knows what it is.

     

    Unfortunately, the onus is on you to prove you were compliant.

     

    I take it you were pretty much on your own in the lane rather than a steady stream of flowing traffic?

  3. Plus the amount of times the risco cloud goes down.

    We don't do res's but I get the vibe that the margins are quite low so repeat visits for issues and you're at a loss. Luckily we dumped all the res's we had acquired on another company so we are Risko free now :)

    Now now.

    You have zero direct evidence to support that comment.

    Also, how come others have little to no problem with risco kit?

    Yet someone makes one post slating them and off you go.

  4. no,

    where a scammer co. is daft enough to publish their bank details on the internet, would it be fun to pay 1p into their a/c in the assumption the bank would charge them more for the transaction ?

    Would certainly cause their book keeper some pain

     

    r u sure, all transfers in are fee free for me (even after 'free year' ends)

    Think it depends on the bank, type of account, and sometimes, turnover.

  5. Cubit what would the pepeio pose make of this ?

     

    In a word??

    Boll0x

     

    Line 2 of the dribble blows their case.

     

    The letter is sent to the Registered Keeper - as that is the only name they can get.

    At no point are you obliged to divvy up the drivers details.

    Therefore, to refuse an 'appeal' if the driver is not named puts them in breach of POFA...and therefore cancels their right to rely on it.

     

    Are we talking Parking Eye here?

  6. I was thinking about you yesterday :)

    My local sainsburys has a new anpr system that I've not seen before. As you drive in you are greeted with this massive sign that flashes up your reg and it tells you what time you better **** off before or else you get a ticket.

    Friendly I thought :)

    And still a waste o money.

    I'd be telling sainsburys where to shove their business.

    And by coincidence, submitted 3 'appeals' last night. I use the term appeal loosely of course as they all stated evidence was heading of to the relevant bodies informing them of the fraudulent activity.

    Puts DVLA in a bit of a fix as they issued data when the scammer was breaching the Kadoe contract. Naughty naughty.

    I wonder what the legal department of a certain grocery store will make of it.

  7. I don't think anyone said it was the 'correct' cable, just that it isn't the cable type that's causing tamper or O/C problems.

    never said they did and never said it was.

    Simply alluding to the fact it happens more than it should.

    That said, the propeies of that cable means you can't say it isn't the cause - without testing.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.