If someone's home they will just disarm it and app will show who did it, what's the point of 5min thing, take em three minutes to teef your stuff
Or I miss something as usual , I see a few LCD risco screens recently , rubbish LCD , I still think the galaxy version bulky but better lol
That probably goes for many manufacturers, they can't really prove failures when "hacked" if that's the right word to use
Historical is relevant in the sense of see what has occurred and was not reported ,
Although it seems programming can cause those issues by the house basher , and then you don't get the correct alarms sent through anyway!
When you insert battery I think it lights up, if it's right one I am talking about you hold the opp two buttons as put in battery
So disarm/part arm for one protocol
And
Full-total arm / disarm for other protocol
One of them should make it work
Its in instructions
But surely there would be a record of failures where perhaps a bulgary or fire took place and perhaps no signalling was sent ,regardless of csl it would show up with the Maintainer no?
What you mean one core? You mean one cable daisy chained? data Pirs seem the future really , brought up here before , data bus instead of having to use so many cores or have so many cables, keypads already doing it, makes sense for detectors to
I know this won't help, but realistically can't you just cert self yourselves and no big deal ?
We need changes
We need secured industry
We need quals
We need GF rights!
Can't you loop the device somehow and prove it can be defeated , or are they fixed to point to a certain ip, why can't you mimic the ip and then try and defeat it, or you need the device to complete its data connection
Matrix stuff eh