Glad you asked now?!

In Georgy Boy's defence...the wording of my post, clearly misled him!

Edited January 24, 200521 yr by Brian c

Glad you asked now?!

In Georgy Boy's defence...the wording of my post, clearly misled him!

38088[/snapback]

I think i'll go to see doors in frames to Slough (near London) in March. Gonna spend some days in London too and make some comparison..

Flush contact in UPVC door. Inward opening though.

http://www.thesecurityinstaller.co.uk/comm...opic=4924&st=60

Edited February 9, 200521 yr by Chewie

I'm sure there are door frames in Manchester too

38085[/snapback]

Yes but haven't all the doors been kicked in?

Thats a good advert for door contacts and shockies then

You've got an 8 core there, you might as well fit a shockguard as well.

Well any one nsi gold and going to comment? ref my post

38030[/snapback]

Our installation procedures would not allow the use of ANY contact where access to the terminals can be gained by anyone other than our engineer. I trust I am not expected to explain this! It therefore transpires that if we were to use a flush contact the cable would be pulled taught and terminated into a JB thus not allowing removal of the contact without first accessing the JB (the same with shunt locks). It is therefore easier for us to use a surface contact where removal of the top cover would cause a tamper. Now everyone understands the security implications of our decision and this can be related to the same type of common sense that some companies enforce by not allowing staple guns.

jef