james.wilson Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 Whats the thoughts on how this may affect cctv ie if defence case uses same footage and changes the face to the defence KC etc I notice a lot of diy type cameras only ave footage in mp4 format not in a native secure format. 'I was deepfaked by my best friend' - BBC News Quote securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al-yeti Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 47 minutes ago, james.wilson said: Whats the thoughts on how this may affect cctv ie if defence case uses same footage and changes the face to the defence KC etc I notice a lot of diy type cameras only ave footage in mp4 format not in a native secure format. 'I was deepfaked by my best friend' - BBC News This occurs already tho right ? don't you watch movies? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sixwheeledbeast Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 Having listened to the podcast already it's not related, images came from social media. It will take a defence lawyer to get the evidence thrown out on possible deepfake grounds, for change to happen. If you handle evidence properly with decent kit it shouldn't be an issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james.wilson Posted April 4 Author Share Posted April 4 agreed but most systems are not managed properly nor is it decent kit Quote securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterJames Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 This is why to be admissible in court the recordings have to be in original format and watermarked. MP4 is okay for minor crimes where in most cases the crim puts his hands up when he sees the footage because he doesnt know the rules. But if you need evidence that sticks it must be in original format 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al-yeti Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 59 minutes ago, PeterJames said: This is why to be admissible in court the recordings have to be in original format and watermarked. MP4 is okay for minor crimes where in most cases the crim puts his hands up when he sees the footage because he doesnt know the rules. But if you need evidence that sticks it must be in original format Althought it doesn't have to be in original format aslong you can prove the audit trail , then no watermark needed either , atleast that what I have seen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james.wilson Posted April 4 Author Share Posted April 4 50 minutes ago, al-yeti said: Althought it doesn't have to be in original format aslong you can prove the audit trail , then no watermark needed either , atleast that what I have seen i dont think thats right Al, downloaded of a mobile phone app, then sent to a pc to be stored on usb or dvd etc. No-one does it right unless the maintaniner is asked to download the footage Quote securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al-yeti Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 1 hour ago, james.wilson said: i dont think thats right Al, downloaded of a mobile phone app, then sent to a pc to be stored on usb or dvd etc. No-one does it right unless the maintaniner is asked to download the footage I guess so, these days they just take the nvr or dvr with them and that's there trail lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.