sixwheeledbeast Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 Is that the number as reported when you turn the board on? Do you know when it was purchased? Yep. No but it's new. Im also surprised there hasn't been a response from csl on this. I was personally contacted after my videos of Dualcom vs, Redcare, vs webway. Really? Was that the side by side catastrophic failure test? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james.wilson Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 Really? Was that the side by side catastrophic failure test? yes Quote securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybergibbons Posted November 26, 2015 Author Share Posted November 26, 2015 Yep. No but it's new. Fancy dropping an email to CSL support asking for release notes or a changelog between 3.53 and 3.77? Quote I have a blog, some of which is about alarm security and reverse engineering:http://cybergibbons.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybergibbons Posted November 26, 2015 Author Share Posted November 26, 2015 yes I missed this. Can you share it privately? Quote I have a blog, some of which is about alarm security and reverse engineering:http://cybergibbons.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james.wilson Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 http://www.thesecurityinstaller.co.uk/community/topic/32716-dual-path-signalling-devices-dual-path-failure-reporting-times/ Quote securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belfastengineer Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 I spoke to my CSL rep yesterday who denied there site was hacked and also claimed any units tested were more than six years old and there units are completely secure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james.wilson Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 the tests by cg cast doubt on that. Quote securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belfastengineer Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 the tests by cg cast doubt on that. Agreed Got me thinking how secure is there VPNS into ARCS which support there UDL units are Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james.wilson Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 the vpn bit from what i read is very last mile. Its not end to end. Plus i believe alarm delivery and polling are different routes so polling imo does not prove path availability for alarm transmission. ie some use the same path end to end to poll and deliver alarms. Quote securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james.wilson Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 didnt know it was posted elsewhere http://www.diynot.com/diy/threads/csl-dualcom-cs2300-r-vulnerabilities.447125/ Quote securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.