When you have to revert to saying "even in its insecure state" as a reference to G3 security just highlights the state of the industry in some areas and the thinking therein.

Maybe the companies could use it as a tagline.

Dick, what line of business are you in?

I don't have to revert to saying anything.

You're right, you don't, but you did.

Dick, what line of business are you in?

Not of any importance, Norman.

Just curious, you seem quite angry and defensive probably work related I guess?

You're right, you don't, but you did.

Not of any importance, Norman.

Breathe deeply, count to ten, and get off that Daily Mail website...

Oh dear! It makes an utter mockery of monitored security, it really does.

I think that's too much of a sweeping statement.

 

If your line of expertise is not important then your view may be taken as much the same, without some form of clarification to the guys who post on this forum would you not think?

I think that's too much of a sweeping statement.

An opinion you're entitled to.

 

If your line of expertise is not important then your view may be taken as much the same, without some form of clarification to the guys who post on this forum would you not think?

Indeed it may, Jim, but It doesn't alter the findings or my opinions on the very same.

Just curious, you seem quite angry and defensive probably work related I guess?

Not angry or defensive in the slightest. Why on earth you'd come to that conclusion is beyond me. I'm merely saying it as I see it because I don't have to pretend all is well in the world of security like some of you guys obviously are.

Yes, yes you are.

Dick

Breathe deeply, count to ten, and get off that Daily Mail website...

See my response to Norman.

Yes, yes you are.

Dick

Yes, yes you are what, Norman?

Yes we're so convinced everything is alright, the hate is just palpable through the screen towards Cybergibbons, we definately don't want him here and certainly don't encourage him to post his findings on here...

Angry.