Jump to content
Security Installer Community

al-yeti

Trade Full Member
  • Posts

    9,121
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    116

Everything posted by al-yeti

  1. Because it will cause allot of issues just to fill there pockets selling off frequencies What about equipment compatibility? Like you said tell all your customers ofcoms sold it so not our fault yeah?
  2. What about the new wireless frequency then? Is it really going to come about
  3. These days it's hard for them to know if any signalling exists anyway , they will try it on if they really want your stuff
  4. Why not just tell em your a house basher who dabbles with diallers, but to be a pro house basher like me you got to realise customers will rarley use outputs on themSo although I am a hard core house basher, monitoring is not my business model , house bashing is just wack a dialled in with the odd one paying for a gsm as well Off topic hkc needs a free basic app lol
  5. Utter mockery? Not really monitoring has its place , as those who use diallers which overall not as good , just depends what your willing to pay for Grade 3 would be worrying eh?
  6. Of course , remember the old dtmf trick ? Little keypad etc for accessing services
  7. No doubt it's serious But nothing is being proven that it will fall over or could be compromised except on particular units I'd say they staying quiet while they perform there own tests and find a way to patch it if it's at all true But nothing will be fool proof , all software and ip connections will have weaknesses Come on back to pstn ? CG this is right up your street should have given them heads up! http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-34944140
  8. If someone's home they will just disarm it and app will show who did it, what's the point of 5min thing, take em three minutes to teef your stuff Or I miss something as usual , I see a few LCD risco screens recently , rubbish LCD , I still think the galaxy version bulky but better lol
  9. That probably goes for many manufacturers, they can't really prove failures when "hacked" if that's the right word to use Historical is relevant in the sense of see what has occurred and was not reported , Although it seems programming can cause those issues by the house basher , and then you don't get the correct alarms sent through anyway!
  10. When you insert battery I think it lights up, if it's right one I am talking about you hold the opp two buttons as put in battery So disarm/part arm for one protocol And Full-total arm / disarm for other protocol One of them should make it work Its in instructions
  11. But surely there would be a record of failures where perhaps a bulgary or fire took place and perhaps no signalling was sent ,regardless of csl it would show up with the Maintainer no?
  12. Lol of course I should have mentioned that first , house bashing ain't easy I tell ya
  13. Portal version perhaps? Did you try changing the protocol on the remote?
  14. What you mean one core? You mean one cable daisy chained? data Pirs seem the future really , brought up here before , data bus instead of having to use so many cores or have so many cables, keypads already doing it, makes sense for detectors to
  15. CSL Response http://cybergibbons.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/CSL_statement.txt
  16. So what's your connection with risco? Come on seriously some of there stuff is ok but not suprising you went back to there promotion?
  17. I know this won't help, but realistically can't you just cert self yourselves and no big deal ? We need changes We need secured industry We need quals We need GF rights!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.