Intruder Courses
#1
Posted 30 December 2011 - 01:38 PM
#2
Posted 30 December 2011 - 02:12 PM
#3
Posted 30 December 2011 - 02:39 PM
#4
Posted 30 December 2011 - 05:07 PM
Lwillis, on 30 December 2011 - 02:39 PM, said:
its a strange industry as its rather hard to train in a standard manner, most train staff inhouse & try to limit the amout of product supported
#5
Posted 30 December 2011 - 05:17 PM
#6
Posted 31 December 2011 - 02:59 AM
Lwillis, on 30 December 2011 - 02:39 PM, said:
Did you fail?
#7
Posted 31 December 2011 - 07:01 PM
alterEGO, on 31 December 2011 - 02:59 AM, said:
no i did not fail, thanks very much i actually passed 4 months ahead of schedule.
all i was saying was it wasnt so much being trained to do the job it was more showing i could do it by providing evidence collected from my company
#8
Posted 01 January 2012 - 11:20 AM
Lwillis, on 31 December 2011 - 07:01 PM, said:
no i did not fail, thanks very much i actually passed 4 months ahead of schedule.
all i was saying was it wasnt so much being trained to do the job it was more showing i could do it by providing evidence collected from my company
#9
Posted 01 January 2012 - 03:24 PM
Got this not so long back if anyones interested
Quote
I am writing to confirm that the L2 Apprenticeship for learners who started in Autumn 2010 or January 2011 should be finishing soon after Christmas 2011 and I am writing to establish if your learner would like to progress onto the Advanced L3 Apprenticeship. Progression is dependant on the results of their L2 exams etc. and full details will be sent out in January of what is outstanding for those who have expressed a wish to continue.
Funding is available, details as:-
16 – 18 will be fully funded
19 – 24 will costs £2,750 or £3,375 for large employers with over 1000 employees.
If you would like further information or wish to register your learner for the Advance L3 Apprenticeship, please advise by return.
Kind Regards
#10
Posted 01 January 2012 - 04:35 PM
#11
Posted 01 January 2012 - 05:14 PM
Is not a btec nat in electronic engineering more appropriate than a vocational course? seems to me that the nvq's only prove you can do what your gonne learn to do working beside an engineer for a while, whereas a course educating theory may go beyond what that engineer can impart succesfully, and lead to a better understanding of the whole industry
#13
Posted 01 January 2012 - 06:04 PM
#14
Posted 01 January 2012 - 07:05 PM
NVQ's are a record of what you have actually done, whereas a technical cert is just proof you passed the exam
C&G 1882 NVQ
NVQ Level 2 = Installation and team work
NVQ Level 3 = Service/Faults and leading a team
Plenty of mongs with and without NVQ's, good engineers are generally interested in what they do
Edited by reidy, 01 January 2012 - 07:05 PM.
#15
Posted 01 January 2012 - 07:21 PM
reidy, on 01 January 2012 - 07:05 PM, said:
#16
Posted 01 January 2012 - 09:50 PM
norman, on 01 January 2012 - 06:04 PM, said:
The exam was easy if you know how like anything. I got my days at college changed from once a week to once a quarter, it was a waste of time for the most part.
#17
Posted 01 January 2012 - 10:09 PM
alterEGO, on 01 January 2012 - 09:50 PM, said:
well done
alterEGO, on 01 January 2012 - 09:50 PM, said:
only 1 ? guess thats why you got a distinction ?
alterEGO, on 01 January 2012 - 09:50 PM, said:
wow there more than one tree fairy out there ?
#18
Posted 01 January 2012 - 11:47 PM
#19
Posted 02 January 2012 - 11:15 AM
reidy, on 01 January 2012 - 11:47 PM, said:
MrHappy, on 01 January 2012 - 10:09 PM, said:
well done
only 1 ? guess thats why you got a distinction ?
wow there more than one tree fairy out there ?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














