June 28, 201510 yr comment_422267 I've finally gotten round to putting the recessed door contact (Knight A51MULTI G2) for the entry/exit rather than using the hallway PIR. I wired everything up and re-enabled zone 1 but it was displaying tamper. So I stripped back the contact and tested all the resistances 2.2 secure, 6.9 active, 1/0 tamper. I also checked the resistances at the alarm box to make sure I didn't have a break in the cable. To confirm I linked the contact circuit into Zone 6 which was spare and wintex diagnostics registers 2.2 secure (healthy). Finally to confirm Zone 1 I bridged and programmed zone 1 to always closed which returned an active state (unhealthy) Does it sound like Zone 1 is dead and I need to replace the board or could it be a common faults that can be rectified without a board replacement? Edited June 28, 201510 yr by jkno Link to comment https://www.thesecurityinstaller.co.uk/community/topic/38692-texecom-prem-elite-24-zone-1-dead/ Share on other sites Share on LinkedIn Share on X Share on Facebook {lang="reddit_text" Share via email Share on Pinterest More sharing options... Share this post
June 28, 201510 yr comment_422270 If you move the door to another circuit does it work correctly or is it in tamper too securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount. Link to comment https://www.thesecurityinstaller.co.uk/community/topic/38692-texecom-prem-elite-24-zone-1-dead/#findComment-422270 Share on other sites Share on LinkedIn Share on X Share on Facebook {lang="reddit_text" Share via email Share on Pinterest More sharing options... Share this post
June 28, 201510 yr Author comment_422272 I moved the circuit to zone 6 and it works fine. Link to comment https://www.thesecurityinstaller.co.uk/community/topic/38692-texecom-prem-elite-24-zone-1-dead/#findComment-422272 Share on other sites Share on LinkedIn Share on X Share on Facebook {lang="reddit_text" Share via email Share on Pinterest More sharing options... Share this post
June 28, 201510 yr comment_422276 Zone 1 is setup to the correct eol values etc securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount. Link to comment https://www.thesecurityinstaller.co.uk/community/topic/38692-texecom-prem-elite-24-zone-1-dead/#findComment-422276 Share on other sites Share on LinkedIn Share on X Share on Facebook {lang="reddit_text" Share via email Share on Pinterest More sharing options... Share this post
June 28, 201510 yr Author comment_422278 Yep it's sent to Double Pole/EOL like all the other active zones. It doesn't seem to register the bridge I've put in whether it's open or closed. I've stuck the multi meter across zone (no circuit wired up) and it registers as an open/broken circuit. Link to comment https://www.thesecurityinstaller.co.uk/community/topic/38692-texecom-prem-elite-24-zone-1-dead/#findComment-422278 Share on other sites Share on LinkedIn Share on X Share on Facebook {lang="reddit_text" Share via email Share on Pinterest More sharing options... Share this post
June 28, 201510 yr comment_422304 Probably done this already but, Have you removed all wiring from zone 1 terminals and linked them with the correct eol's ? Link to comment https://www.thesecurityinstaller.co.uk/community/topic/38692-texecom-prem-elite-24-zone-1-dead/#findComment-422304 Share on other sites Share on LinkedIn Share on X Share on Facebook {lang="reddit_text" Share via email Share on Pinterest More sharing options... Share this post
June 28, 201510 yr Author comment_422333 I didn't wire a resistor over over the terminals but did confirm the circuit was the correct resistance with the multimeter. I also wired a bridge over and switched it to an always closed circuit which it was registering as open (active). I've emailed texecom I expect it's an replacement board job. Link to comment https://www.thesecurityinstaller.co.uk/community/topic/38692-texecom-prem-elite-24-zone-1-dead/#findComment-422333 Share on other sites Share on LinkedIn Share on X Share on Facebook {lang="reddit_text" Share via email Share on Pinterest More sharing options... Share this post
June 28, 201510 yr comment_422339 So what happens if you select it as eol and bridge with eol as abovd Link to comment https://www.thesecurityinstaller.co.uk/community/topic/38692-texecom-prem-elite-24-zone-1-dead/#findComment-422339 Share on other sites Share on LinkedIn Share on X Share on Facebook {lang="reddit_text" Share via email Share on Pinterest More sharing options... Share this post
June 28, 201510 yr comment_422340 So zone 1 is conventional then, and the remaining zones are fsl, is that correct ? Sorry Al-yeti, typed over you, my mistake. Link to comment https://www.thesecurityinstaller.co.uk/community/topic/38692-texecom-prem-elite-24-zone-1-dead/#findComment-422340 Share on other sites Share on LinkedIn Share on X Share on Facebook {lang="reddit_text" Share via email Share on Pinterest More sharing options... Share this post
June 28, 201510 yr Author comment_422345 Just to remove any confusion all zones are FSL the contact circuit I want on zone 1 registers at 2.2 secure 6.9 active. As part of my investigation after ruling out any fault at the contact or circuit I remove the circuit from the zone, bridged and reprogrammed as always closed. The zone isn't registering the bridge and thinks its open/active. I'll try a 2.2 resistor just to confirm but think it will be futile because the contact circuit was confirmed with the multimeter at 2.2 and a basic bridge on always closed isn't registered meaning something isn't right on the zone. Link to comment https://www.thesecurityinstaller.co.uk/community/topic/38692-texecom-prem-elite-24-zone-1-dead/#findComment-422345 Share on other sites Share on LinkedIn Share on X Share on Facebook {lang="reddit_text" Share via email Share on Pinterest More sharing options... Share this post
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.