If you have an engineering degree you'll be terrible at working on alarms. In fact everyone I know with a degree has very very little common sense.

Get an engineer out and do the job properly.

A contadiction in two paragraphs.

Oxford based? wonder if you know your chekov from your kirchhoff..

A contadiction in two paragraphs.

Oxford based? wonder if you know your chekov from your kirchhoff..

Oh God, Kirchoffs Laws. Now your taking me back a bit, do they still teach them to trainees?

Oxford based? wonder if you know your chekov from your kirchhoff..

sounds like a couple of eastern euro ?

chekov works at the hand car wash & kirchhoff gone home to poland ?

Nooooo Chekov drove Enterprise!

Nooooo Chekov drove Enterprise!

Beam me up Scottie.

Edited August 19, 201015 yr by Specialist

Oh God, Kirchoffs Laws. Now your taking me back a bit, do they still teach them to trainees?

I should blooody well hope so.!

Nooooo Chekov drove Enterprise!

the security wholesaler ?

LOL was waiting for that.

I should blooody well hope so.!

I hope so too, but not really convinced they do. Most courses nowadays seem to be Monkey see Monkey do, or am i just being cynical? Had course details from 1 training provider a while back & it seemed if a trainee could complete a task twice in succession they were deemed competent, they did'nt have to know why they were doing it. e.g fit a Plug top to a length of flex twice in succession then they were competent, no mention of fuse ratings etc.

I hope so too, but not really convinced they do. Most courses nowadays seem to be Monkey see Monkey do, or am i just being cynical? Had course details from 1 training provider a while back & it seemed if a trainee could complete a task twice in succession they were deemed competent, they did'nt have to know why they were doing it. e.g fit a Plug top to a length of flex twice in succession then they were competent, no mention of fuse ratings etc.

Scary ain't it.