Jump to content
Security Installer Community

james.wilson

Admin
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    30,699

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    290

 Content Type 

Everything posted by james.wilson

  1. james.wilson
    yes
  2. james.wilson
    How much other gear is insecure?
  3. james.wilson
    Al the units tested are gprs pstn. If you think pstn is secure then id suggest you look at the dtmf protocol. Question. Would you fit gear with a security question mark over it?
  4. james.wilson
    Where you getting the firmware file from?
  5. james.wilson
    Al this is imo far more serious than anyone getting the pins wrong. Anyone has the right to assume what they fit will do the job and won't be compromised. Grade 2 who cares its low risk. G3 and above is different. I'm interested in nova's comment that the loss would be down to the arc, I don't see that as the arc didn't certify compliance the installer does. We assume the chain complies when the cert is issued. I'm seriously concerned about this and like the vw thing doubt its just one.
  6. james.wilson
    get of the fence adi, say what you really mean
  7. james.wilson
    didnt know it was posted elsewhere http://www.diynot.com/diy/threads/csl-dualcom-cs2300-r-vulnerabilities.447125/
  8. james.wilson
    the vpn bit from what i read is very last mile. Its not end to end. Plus i believe alarm delivery and polling are different routes so polling imo does not prove path availability for alarm transmission. ie some use the same path end to end to poll and deliver alarms.
  9. james.wilson
    the tests by cg cast doubt on that.
  10. james.wilson
    http://www.thesecurityinstaller.co.uk/community/topic/32716-dual-path-signalling-devices-dual-path-failure-reporting-times/
  11. james.wilson
    yes
  12. james.wilson
    Im also surprised there hasn't been a response from csl on this. I was personally contacted after my videos of Dualcom vs, Redcare, vs webway.
  13. james.wilson
    Surprised as such maintainers will be liable that it isn't a busier topic. My take is that I needed to remove them. Seems a lot of firms don't care that they are fitting very insecure devices.
  14. james.wilson
    Be interesting if that's just 100 affected units? Can't agree that its a round 600 units affected. That is imo bullsh1t Is that grade 3 units, or gradeshift grade 4 Most end users won't know, care or give one as their insurer will come back on the maintainer. I wonder what the insurers think on this. As usual the insurers will ask for Dualcom plus
  15. james.wilson
    So as of April 2015 your findings are valid?
  16. james.wilson
    So 2013 firmware was in your report?
  17. james.wilson
    Good info
  18. james.wilson
    are there any dates on the versions you have or a list of firmware release dates?
  19. james.wilson
    How would one verify that?
  20. james.wilson
    http://www.engadget.com/2015/11/24/xandem-camera-free-security/
  21. james.wilson
    I would hope it was viewed more than a heating controller. Its a bit more serious. I suppose at some point it will be taken up by mainstream media?
  22. james.wilson
    so what do u use?
  23. james.wilson
    So what do U use?
  24. james.wilson
    Agreed Stayed away from what technology?
  25. james.wilson
    id of thought that security on a security signalling device is pretty damn important
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

  I accept