Jump to content
Security Installer Community

Hi-Res Picture Of Csl Dualcom Unit


Recommended Posts

We don't know...

 

On this page it says "end to end encryption":

http://www.csldual.com/Products/Worldsim/

 

Then on this document:

http://www.csldual.com/products/additionalmanuals/dualCom%20gradeshift%C2%AE%20range%20elements.pdf

 

It says it uses AES-256 on an IPSEC VPN.

 

Just can't see how you maintain that on GPRS without a lot of really unwanted overhead.

 

Also not seeing any key material in their firmware image.


Are there any CSL Dualcom people on here? Just be interested to find out. 

I have a blog, some of which is about alarm security and reverse engineering:
http://cybergibbons.com/

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, only got part 7 which is "packet switched networks", I don't think GPRS is covered under that? Not sure. Possibly the least readable of all of the standards anyway.

 

Maybe Mr Mealing might know if GPRS needs to be encrypted end to end?

I have a blog, some of which is about alarm security and reverse engineering:
http://cybergibbons.com/

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, only got part 7 which is "packet switched networks", I don't think GPRS is covered under that? Not sure. Possibly the least readable of all of the standards anyway.

 

Maybe Mr Mealing might know if GPRS needs to be encrypted end to end?

Not my area of expertise, however there is a document floating around CLC/FprTS50136-9 Requirements for common protocol for alarm transmission systems using the Internet Protocol. This is i think voluntary at the moment, but does detail requirements for encryption at both ends, t65his is still going through Europe at te moment and i am not sure on the state of the voting, whether positive or negative.

 

So the short answer at the moment i would guess is there is no requirement.

amealing@texe.com

Head of Industry Affairs

Visit Our Website
Texecom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the input. The EN50131 is really quite a clear standard. EN50136 is really heavy going in comparison, it might be my lack of familiarity with all the terminology.

 

A quick correct to the above - my conversion from Intel HEX to binary was incorrect, and looking at it, there is a chunk of very high entropy which would indicate some kind of key material.

 

Screenshot-from-2013-06-26-174318.png

 

Anyway, lots of stuff to get on with/

I have a blog, some of which is about alarm security and reverse engineering:
http://cybergibbons.com/

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to update,the only published standards for ATS we are using n the UK are these

 

BS EN 50136-1-1:1998+A2:2008,

Alarm systems – Alarm transmission

systems and equipment – Part 1-1: General requirements for alarm

transmission systems

 

BS EN 50136-1-2:1998,

Alarm systems – Alarm transmission systems

and equipment – Part 1-2: Requirements for systems using dedicated

alarm paths

 

BS EN 50136-1-3:1998,

Alarm systems – Alarm transmission systems

and equipment – Part 1-3: Requirements for systems with digital

communicators using the public switched telephone network

 

BS EN 50136-1-4:1998,

Alarm systems – Alarm transmission systems

and equipment – Part 1-4: Requirements for systems with voice

communicators using the public switched telephone network

 

BS EN 50136-1-5:2008,

Alarm systems – Alarm transmission systems and

equipment – Part 1.5: Requirements for Packet Switched Network PSN

amealing@texe.com

Head of Industry Affairs

Visit Our Website
Texecom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.