topalarms Posted April 1, 2008 Share Posted April 1, 2008 Panel/ARC log should show if it was set or not - engineer inside the panel doesn't look good! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whistle Posted April 1, 2008 Share Posted April 1, 2008 Intresting... So, cut throught the shutter, avoiding the contacts. Maybe they had been in the place before, and masked the detectors(assuming their not A/M D.T's.) If so lets hope they did an RA on survey. A site like that must be grade 3? Well dual path signaling is a start Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morgan306 Posted April 1, 2008 Share Posted April 1, 2008 Quite right,unless it was installed before EN/PD came into force. I wonder if the outcome will ever be made public. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antinode Posted April 1, 2008 Share Posted April 1, 2008 Panel looks like a Galaxy G3 at 0:45. Looks like he's doing some major tweaking aswell lol. Glad I'm not in his shoes! Trade Member Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alarm Protection Posted April 1, 2008 Share Posted April 1, 2008 I feel sorry for the engineer in the position he is in. This guy might have not fitted the system but felt like a fud when the cameras etc were there. I hope the story does come out not only for the alarm comp that installed the system to take note but for all other companies to make sure every device is to spec as we all do though. I would hate to be in the alarm companys shoes right now! Must be a nightmare. Could it hve been an inside job????? It has happened before but the log should say who armed the system. If it was my site then the place would have all detection and back up! They stole my red mitsi!!! lol ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morgan306 Posted April 1, 2008 Share Posted April 1, 2008 Good spot antinode! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whistle Posted April 1, 2008 Share Posted April 1, 2008 looks like a G3 48 or 144. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alterEGO Posted April 1, 2008 Share Posted April 1, 2008 my guess is some sort of non confirmed signal due to design, if so this could be the first major fail due to design of confirmation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barsnake Posted April 1, 2008 Share Posted April 1, 2008 Quote Our system does use dual zone protection, it seems as if the alarm did its job but for some reason the monitoring station didn't get the signal, which is where the thieves could have bypassed the signal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smoke Screen Posted April 2, 2008 Share Posted April 2, 2008 Bypassed the signal? Matt Gilmartin, Sales Director T: +44(01205) 821111 | F: +44(01205) 820316 info@smoke-screen.co.uk | www.smoke-screen.co.uk Head office: 1-2 North End, Swineshead, Boston, Lincs PE20 3LR Registered in the UK no. 2728491 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.