Jump to content


Spam Cops


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
16 replies to this topic

#1 camerabloke

camerabloke

    CCTV GURU

  • Trade Full Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,967 posts

Posted 24 November 2008 - 05:26 PM

too slow to stop my 8 year old daughter seeing these images from KedoSezed
Eucam Security Systems
0845 4630 746
www.eucam.co.uk

#2 alterEGO

alterEGO

    Elite Member +

  • Trade Full Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,096 posts

Posted 24 November 2008 - 05:33 PM

your bitter :P

Edited by alterEGO, 24 November 2008 - 05:33 PM.


#3 camerabloke

camerabloke

    CCTV GURU

  • Trade Full Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,967 posts

Posted 24 November 2008 - 05:33 PM

nope just angry
Eucam Security Systems
0845 4630 746
www.eucam.co.uk

#4 Chorlton

Chorlton

    "The Neurologist"

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,830 posts

Posted 24 November 2008 - 05:59 PM

so it's their fault is it Darren?
Not the spammers or yours eh.
Tell you what as we have no control over what gets posted I suggest you don't log in with under 18's in the room from now on.

Some people :rolleyes:

#5 jameswilson

jameswilson

    Famous Member

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,481 posts

Posted 24 November 2008 - 06:06 PM

It is a difficult one. i must admit. Thre is now many more that can remove these than previously there was, and id say the time spans are pretty well covered. Normally I myslef would be on more in working hours but we are so stacked im actually out working at the moment.

Darren you can usually guess from the title what the likly content is, i would advise you avoid these or any others your not sure off when your little one is in the room.
Cant help with your other favorites though ;)

#6 breff

breff

    Texecom Premier Bod

  • Trade Full Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,537 posts

Posted 24 November 2008 - 06:10 PM

How did you stop your daughter seeing stuff when you were a Moderator Darren?
The opinions I express are mine and are usually correct!
(Except when I'm wrong)(which I'm not)

#7 A-G

A-G

    Super Member

  • Global Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,509 posts

Posted 24 November 2008 - 06:11 PM

Camerabloke, I'm very sorry your daughter saw some sordid images, but I wasn't responsible for them ... nor am I to blame in any way.

If I was being paid £1k a week to oversee the site 24 hours a day you could complain if I missed something ....... but I aint! I do it for nothing as a favour to Chris & James.


Having said all this, if you saw a new post from a new member called KedoSezed and probably with a strange thread title ...... what did you expect to see when you opened the thread? If your child was nearby you should have been more careful. You've been around long enough to know that spam exists, so you need to consider your actions before you criticise mine.


This is just my opinion. I won't enter into an argument of rights or wrongs.


.... I would also like to add that I have deleted several offending posts and I'm sure the other Spam Cops have too ...... so without our actions your daughter would be at greater risk of seeing unwelcome images.

Edited by AlarmGuard, 24 November 2008 - 06:16 PM.

.
.
.
PM me for access to the SSAIB members discussion area.

#8 hpotter

hpotter

    Super Member +

  • Trade Full Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,798 posts

Posted 24 November 2008 - 06:55 PM

I've got to take some blame for it.

I was on line reading another topic, clicked on new posts, then read camerablokes new thread (as was mose recent) before deleting the offending post.

I'm truely sorry camerabloke, your daughter caught sight of it.

Would be grateful though if you could hit the report button, that I might be alerted to the offending post. It would of (possibly) prevented other innocents from viewing same.

#9 luggsey

luggsey

    Super Member

  • Trade Full Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,505 posts

Posted 24 November 2008 - 07:03 PM

View Posthpotter, on Nov 24 2008, 06:55 PM, said:

I've got to take some blame for it.

I was on line reading another topic, clicked on new posts, then read camerablokes new thread (as was mose recent) before deleting the offending post.

I'm truely sorry camerabloke, your daughter caught sight of it.

Would be grateful though if you could hit the report button, that I might be alerted to the offending post. It would of (possibly) prevented other innocents from viewing same.

Yes I assumed it had been reported and I had missed the PM.
REPORT first before complaining with a post!!!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Life is like a box of chocolates, some bugger always gets the nice ones!


Email me

My Amateur Radio Forum

#10 magpye

magpye

    Super Member

  • Trade Full Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,168 posts

Posted 24 November 2008 - 07:26 PM

View Postluggsey, on Nov 24 2008, 07:03 PM, said:

Yes I assumed it had been reported and I had missed the PM.
REPORT first before complaining with a post!!!
If it had been reported, wouldn't all of us had the PM/Report, I've not seen one today?
Someone told me I was ignorant and apathetic, I don't know what that means, nor do I care.

#11 Chorlton

Chorlton

    "The Neurologist"

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,830 posts

Posted 24 November 2008 - 07:45 PM

think thats luggseys point magpye, had it been reported the pm's would have gone out and given a faster response.
mine get pushed to my hotmail account so i get a "pop up" appear while I'm writting quotes etc.
James possibly has his pushed to his blackberry thingy as he's alot more switched on with the IT stuff than me.
either way the chance of catching them quick as possible is vastly improved using the report button.

Lets not be to harsh with CB though he's only pulling our leg...........surely.

C

#12 Cubit

Cubit

    Super Member +

  • Trade Full Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,903 posts

Posted 24 November 2008 - 07:49 PM

View Postbreff, on Nov 24 2008, 06:10 PM, said:

How did you stop your daughter seeing stuff when you were a Moderator Darren?
Ouch!
"Bother!" said Pooh, as he found his smack had talc in it.

#13 jameswilson

jameswilson

    Famous Member

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,481 posts

Posted 24 November 2008 - 07:50 PM

lol your not posting this stuff are you darren?
(runs off to check the ip's)

#14 camerabloke

camerabloke

    CCTV GURU

  • Trade Full Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,967 posts

Posted 24 November 2008 - 10:14 PM

not the sort of replies i expected TBH. but never mind eh?

View PostAlarmGuard, on Nov 24 2008, 07:11 PM, said:

Camerabloke, I'm very sorry your daughter saw some sordid images, but I wasn't responsible for them ... nor am I to blame in any way.

If I was being paid £1k a week to oversee the site 24 hours a day you could complain if I missed something ....... but I aint! I do it for nothing as a favour to Chris & James.


Having said all this, if you saw a new post from a new member called KedoSezed and probably with a strange thread title ...... what did you expect to see when you opened the thread? If your child was nearby you should have been more careful. You've been around long enough to know that spam exists, so you need to consider your actions before you criticise mine.


This is just my opinion. I won't enter into an argument of rights or wrongs.


.... I would also like to add that I have deleted several offending posts and I'm sure the other Spam Cops have too ...... so without our actions your daughter would be at greater risk of seeing unwelcome images.
why should "I" be more careful? i have parental controls on my PC and i ensure my kids are not subjected to things like that.

i know things like this cant be helped, but surely there are programs that let you hasve more filters etc?

View PostAlarmGuard, on Nov 24 2008, 07:11 PM, said:

Camerabloke, I'm very sorry your daughter saw some sordid images, but I wasn't responsible for them ... nor am I to blame in any way.

If I was being paid £1k a week to oversee the site 24 hours a day you could complain if I missed something ....... but I aint! I do it for nothing as a favour to Chris & James.


Having said all this, if you saw a new post from a new member called KedoSezed and probably with a strange thread title ...... what did you expect to see when you opened the thread? If your child was nearby you should have been more careful. You've been around long enough to know that spam exists, so you need to consider your actions before you criticise mine.


This is just my opinion. I won't enter into an argument of rights or wrongs.


.... I would also like to add that I have deleted several offending posts and I'm sure the other Spam Cops have too ...... so without our actions your daughter would be at greater risk of seeing unwelcome images.
dont push this on me! i expected to see a security related post on a security forum

Edited by camerabloke, 24 November 2008 - 10:10 PM.

Eucam Security Systems
0845 4630 746
www.eucam.co.uk

#15 Chorlton

Chorlton

    "The Neurologist"

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,830 posts

Posted 24 November 2008 - 10:24 PM

You know it's only happens in the public forums so if you want I can make you "trade only" ?
Apart from that you have to accept it can and will happen dispite our best endevours.
Nobody is pushing anything on anyone....you stated the stoopid topic.
Happy = log in.
Not happy = log out.
The end.
C.

#16 camerabloke

camerabloke

    CCTV GURU

  • Trade Full Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,967 posts

Posted 24 November 2008 - 10:26 PM

i know it happens, i was cheesed off. but stupid comments from other members dont help
Eucam Security Systems
0845 4630 746
www.eucam.co.uk

#17 jameswilson

jameswilson

    Famous Member

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,481 posts

Posted 24 November 2008 - 10:27 PM

Unfortunatly darren things will be posted on all forums. Theonly way we can 100% stop it is to have everything on preview. We cant filter it more than we have. Most of it is blocked by the filter but you 'could' post whatever you liked and if it needed to be removed, it would be reported and then someone would remove it. Alternativly you could try just viewing things more then 6 hours old then id say its likly to have been dealt with by then.
If you do know of a more foolproof or better system then I for one am always open to suggestions.

James




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users