Dom Cielo 0 Posted June 17, 2014 Hello everyone, first of all, sorry for my bad english. I'm in doubt between two sensor models: Rokonet RK815DTAMG3 and Texecom AMDT. The Texecom has the ACT (Anti covers, umbrella) technology or just anti-mask? Thank you. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sixwheeledbeast 405 Posted June 17, 2014 "ACT" is a Rokonet only feature. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dom Cielo 0 Posted June 17, 2014 Six, you say the technology or the brand 'ACT'? No other manufacturer has the technology that detects the use of covers or umbrellas? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sixwheeledbeast 405 Posted June 17, 2014 Six, you say the technology or the brand 'ACT'? No other manufacturer has the technology that detects the use of covers or umbrellas? The brand ACT, however, I haven't seen any other "Anti-Cloaking" detectors. Why do you feel you need anti-cloaking detectors? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dom Cielo 0 Posted June 17, 2014 Thanks, Six. The place where I will install is high risk (jewelry). I've read the manual available on the Rokonet site but I can not understand if all Iwise have ACT or just a few. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sixwheeledbeast 405 Posted June 17, 2014 My opinion is if they have got into the premises to use an umbrella or cloak then the protection isn't correct. Masking could be done days before a break in so AM is important here. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dom Cielo 0 Posted June 17, 2014 Yes, it is also important. In fact, not only protects these ACT camouflage, but also an ambient temperature close to the human body. In addition to motion detectors, seismic be used (impact). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sixwheeledbeast 405 Posted June 17, 2014 but also an ambient temperature close to the human body Most good quality quads have background temperature compensation, without having to switch to microwave only. Like http://www.optex-europe.com/products/optex/44-oml-dam/ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ronnie 41 Posted June 17, 2014 iWise = bulletproof. Don't waste your time looking elsewhere. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sixwheeledbeast 405 Posted June 17, 2014 iWise = bulletproof. Don't waste your time looking elsewhere. I wouldn't agree, but to each there own. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
matthew.brough 15 Posted June 17, 2014 iWise = bulletproof. Don't waste your time looking elsewhere.Had a couple of drinks tonight ? Quote monitored-alarms.nsi-gold-approved.co.uk/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ronnie 41 Posted June 17, 2014 Had a couple of drinks tonight ? I wouldn't agree, but to each there own. Had a couple of drinks tonight ? are you 2 mental? 100's and 100's of these and not one problem (maybe 1 out of box failure).. best detector out there, no question. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
matthew.brough 15 Posted June 17, 2014 Can't talk for six but mental deficiencies has been suggested, yes Quote monitored-alarms.nsi-gold-approved.co.uk/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ronnie 41 Posted June 17, 2014 Had a couple of drinks tonight ? and yes.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sixwheeledbeast 405 Posted June 17, 2014 100's and 100's of these and not one problem (maybe 1 out of box failure).. best detector out there, no question. Same here for our preferred product, I don't see why I am being "mental". Just like you don't do Scantronic we don't do Risk-o, the Rokonet detector was the nail in the coffin years ago. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cubit 11 Posted June 17, 2014 Plenty of evidence on here to suggest the iwise detectors are very popular. Quote "Bother!", said Pooh, as he found his smack had talc in it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
9651 12 Posted June 17, 2014 We used to fit them, I rate them. Liked the fact the dt and quads look the same. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ronnie 41 Posted June 17, 2014 Same here for our preferred product, I don't see why I am being "mental". Just like you don't do Scantronic we don't do Risk-o, the Rokonet detector was the nail in the coffin years ago. So you don't disagree they are good? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dom Cielo 0 Posted June 18, 2014 Guys, thanks for the help. Reading an information about Texecon, found the information "pulse counter", what is it? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
secureiam 9 Posted June 18, 2014 Texecom have/ did have an cloakwise detector based on a DT from memory Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sixwheeledbeast 405 Posted June 18, 2014 So you don't disagree they are good? I think there pants. Guys, thanks for the help. Reading an information about Texecon, found the information "pulse counter", what is it? Basically an adjustment for the PIR's sensitivity. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Adi 17 Posted June 18, 2014 SWB, stop winding Dom up. Dom, if you lie the detector on your wrist, the pir LED will flash with your pulse. Quote I really can't be ar**** with it anymore. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sixwheeledbeast 405 Posted June 18, 2014 Dom, if you lie the detector on your wrist, the pir LED will flash with your pulse.Pot, kettle ... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dom Cielo 0 Posted June 18, 2014 Thank you all. I chose the RK815. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ronnie 41 Posted June 18, 2014 Thank you all. I chose the RK815. A very (i)wise decision.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
