Dom Cielo Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 Hello everyone, first of all, sorry for my bad english. I'm in doubt between two sensor models: Rokonet RK815DTAMG3 and Texecom AMDT. The Texecom has the ACT (Anti covers, umbrella) technology or just anti-mask? Thank you. Link to comment https://www.thesecurityinstaller.co.uk/community/topic/36898-rokonet-vs-texecom/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
sixwheeledbeast Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 "ACT" is a Rokonet only feature. Link to comment https://www.thesecurityinstaller.co.uk/community/topic/36898-rokonet-vs-texecom/#findComment-385827 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dom Cielo Posted June 17, 2014 Author Share Posted June 17, 2014 Six, you say the technology or the brand 'ACT'? No other manufacturer has the technology that detects the use of covers or umbrellas? Link to comment https://www.thesecurityinstaller.co.uk/community/topic/36898-rokonet-vs-texecom/#findComment-385828 Share on other sites More sharing options...
sixwheeledbeast Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 Six, you say the technology or the brand 'ACT'? No other manufacturer has the technology that detects the use of covers or umbrellas? The brand ACT, however, I haven't seen any other "Anti-Cloaking" detectors. Why do you feel you need anti-cloaking detectors? Link to comment https://www.thesecurityinstaller.co.uk/community/topic/36898-rokonet-vs-texecom/#findComment-385831 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dom Cielo Posted June 17, 2014 Author Share Posted June 17, 2014 Thanks, Six. The place where I will install is high risk (jewelry). I've read the manual available on the Rokonet site but I can not understand if all Iwise have ACT or just a few. Link to comment https://www.thesecurityinstaller.co.uk/community/topic/36898-rokonet-vs-texecom/#findComment-385839 Share on other sites More sharing options...
sixwheeledbeast Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 My opinion is if they have got into the premises to use an umbrella or cloak then the protection isn't correct. Masking could be done days before a break in so AM is important here. Link to comment https://www.thesecurityinstaller.co.uk/community/topic/36898-rokonet-vs-texecom/#findComment-385842 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dom Cielo Posted June 17, 2014 Author Share Posted June 17, 2014 Yes, it is also important. In fact, not only protects these ACT camouflage, but also an ambient temperature close to the human body. In addition to motion detectors, seismic be used (impact). Link to comment https://www.thesecurityinstaller.co.uk/community/topic/36898-rokonet-vs-texecom/#findComment-385851 Share on other sites More sharing options...
sixwheeledbeast Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 but also an ambient temperature close to the human body Most good quality quads have background temperature compensation, without having to switch to microwave only. Like http://www.optex-europe.com/products/optex/44-oml-dam/ Link to comment https://www.thesecurityinstaller.co.uk/community/topic/36898-rokonet-vs-texecom/#findComment-385855 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronnie Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 iWise = bulletproof. Don't waste your time looking elsewhere. Link to comment https://www.thesecurityinstaller.co.uk/community/topic/36898-rokonet-vs-texecom/#findComment-385858 Share on other sites More sharing options...
sixwheeledbeast Posted June 17, 2014 Share Posted June 17, 2014 iWise = bulletproof. Don't waste your time looking elsewhere. I wouldn't agree, but to each there own. Link to comment https://www.thesecurityinstaller.co.uk/community/topic/36898-rokonet-vs-texecom/#findComment-385859 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.