Jump to content
Security Installer Community

Dick

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    90

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Dick

  1. Dick
    Agreed, but the trust is being tested as technology moves on and largely away from what installers have been used to for many years. There is now another 'breed' in the mix of security and these guys are, on occasions, failing at the first hurdle to make the hardware secure via inadequate software programming. Companies using independent certified security experts to give their equipment a seal of approval should be the only way forward now if trust is to be maintained.
  2. Dick
    All things being equal yes, but this has to be different from now on in. It is only the beginning too where security is concerned if we go down the route of the ever popular automated equipment.
  3. Dick
    It has to be the manufacturer for allowing such inferior equipment to be released. Everyone else down the line has worked on trust.
  4. Dick
    Bag and cat spring to mind though. Things might and should change. As an end user I'd be livid with the findings too. Having said that, I'm not an end user of said equipment and I'm not surprised with what CG has released.
  5. Dick
  6. Dick
    Peter, wasn't the DPA amended last December to prevent filming outside a domestic property? https://ico.org.uk/for-the-public/cctv/"If your camera covers, even partially, any areas beyond the boundaries of your property, such as neighbouring gardens or the street, then it will no longer be exempt from the Data Protection Act (DPA) under the domestic purposes exemption. This does not mean that you are breaching the DPA but it does mean that you are subject to it."
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

  I accept