Jump to content
Security Installer Community

goncall

Trade Full Member
  • Posts

    9,216
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    118

Posts posted by goncall

  1. depending on the type of farm it is beams might not be suitable,for contacts I'd use roller shutter contacts glanded either into a conduit box or small ip rated jb,but I'd also look at installing all cables in heavy duty plastic conduit due to mice rats etc which will eat any exposed cable more so in a farm environment where they are plenty

  2. just buy a second hand lappy if its getting lugged around site,ive got a company toshiba thats around 7 yr old and scratched to bits and a bit **** but its only got work software on and its fine does what it needs to do

  3. I have nothing against ADT, however, a local would just quote a GSM or Wifi solution for a lot less than £800, now ADT may also be a lot less than £800 but  engineer should have called the office and quoted the correct price. At the end of the day its about giving the customer the right information so they can make the right decision

    the way i read it is the adt engineer didnt try to get him to upgrade and gave the cost reason as to much to be viable and probably told the sub to get a socket fitted next to the panel,but then you have 2 members encouraging the sub to ditch adt for no reason than they are not a local,now thats what i call impartial advice  :-

  4. As they broke it I do think you should go back to them with ur comments. I have never used a 9100 so dont know

    sorry jimmy but that's *****,your condoning end users messing around with systems on contract and blaming the maintainer in favour of the user,im sure they will sign up to your shiney badge utopia theory and take over from the people you say you try to protect..just saying like and piss boiling to boot

  5. Thanks for all the great input. The tamper switch had actually been broken by the Service Company, & they had tried to fix it with tin foil & bluetack!

    Luckily as the device was left in Programming Mode, I could reset the Engineer's code, & change the Tamper Smitch.

    Then fixed the PIR (which had been disconnected by the Service Company), & fixed 2 Zones that we had to omit for the last 5 years (these were simple problems).

    All is good now :-)

     

    I have one further question that I can't fathom. The Entry/Exit door has a lock with a shunt. When the alarm is in Day mode, the lock USED to give a 2 tone (high, low) indication when it was locked. However, now it gives the high/low indication when the door is UN-Locked, & nothing when the door is locked.

     

    I recall this happened once before, but didn't see what the Service company did to change this back to the 2 tones when locking.

    Looking at the programming guide I have "9100/9105 Installation & User Guide", I can't work out what I need to do to reverse the behaviour.

    Any tips appreciated, & once again, THANKS FOR THE FANTASTIC SUPPORT.

    Martin

    lol

  6. 130 hrs! Farking hell, something to get you're teeth into then??

    it wasn't meant to be but that's how it turned out,4 panel networked gents vigi around 1k devices none with any labels and no paperwork it was a case of testing every device and putting labels in thru the front door ,touch wood it's been fine and gets me plenty of overtime on ri's as customer only lets testing on a weekend

  7. 130 hrs! Farking hell, something to get you're teeth into then??

    How do you go about marking heads for the split servicing, coloured dots or some other way?

    to be honest I havnt seen the coloured dots thing for a while we do for example (as people have different ways )on a 4 zone system would be wrote down as full test zones 1 and 3 random zones 2 and 4 next vist full test zones 2 and 4 random zones 1 and 3 and sounders and relays marked as tested or not tested if customer declines

  8. Just getting a feel of what other co's don't on an initial take over

    On taking over an existing system we will give 100% test, mark detectors for future 6 monthly/quarterly tests (if not already) and full zone list/plan Any deviations noted and passed to the customer.

    It seems a good proportion of these take overs have "50%" test in the log book, but as sensors ain't marked who's to know what's been tested?! And also have no existing zone plans or device lists...

    are we being too thorough if there's such a thing?! Just seems lots of fire I see are maybe just functionally tested by a spark and that's that??

    do 100% on takeovers tho depends on size of job ,we have a multiday inspection code so it can take say 12 hrs over 3 days to do the takeover,tho done one about 2 yrs ago that took 130 man hours over 5 weeks

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.