AdrianMealing

He's having a laugh with the pricing of just about everything he sells.

Clearly, collection only as well

No still the same protocol as far as I am aware, pretty sure its works with any panel that natively supports the ComIP which i think was version 7, it may have been earlier

No new hardware required, the rest covered by the other guys. Should work on older panels as well, that's part of the testing, the IP protocol has not changed since introduction so i think it will work on Premier panels back to V7, maybe earlier.

It can do it through Montex, but its not the slickest solution by any means. We are currently testing internally a new version of the apps with push notification, should be available early next year.

My son has the galaxy tab, and he really rates it, previously he had an iPad. As for yourself make sure you have some paracetamol handy

Pretty much what has been said, its been around for a few years, likely to be a few more years before we see anything. I would agree

The difference is they have to be dedicated, not allowed to do anything else

Good, as long as we are happy, pins are still **** though

Yes you can, as long as the HU fob does not perform any other function, and the buttons are dedicated to HU.

Then use proper signalling , pins should be shot, surviving pins should be shot again, and then buried with the rest of the dinosaurs. If a tamper signal cannot contribute to a confirmed activation, what's the point of tampers? It's parts of the standards like this that are trying to educate the industry to stop using outdated nonsensical technology.

Sorry i misunderstand what you are saying, what you have said should be confirmed, Alarm from device 1 tamper from device 2 = confirmed alarm. What i have said is tamper from device 1 followed by alarm from device 1 or vice versa does not equal confirmed.

Tamp no confirm is only for the same device, so if the device goes active, then a tamper from the same device will not cause a confirmed alarm, however a tamper from another device in the confirmation window will. Depends on the order, if tamper first then yes send tamper, if activation first then tamper from a different device, = Alarm + confirmed Only from the same device

Like i said packed lunch, if staff on the road get lunch then so should office staff, all very short sighted IMHO depending on staff numbers all that cash just comes of the bottom line, eventually something will have to give. Usually jobs.

Yes they have a queens head printed on them and come in metal and paper formats

I assume you mean away as in not coming home that day? Even so makes no difference, i cannot see why there is an entitlement, my place of work is my home, if i go to the office i pay for my own lunch, as does everybody else who goes to the office from their home, even though their main place of work is the office. If you don't want to have to buy lunch then take a packed lunch, that's what i did for years. And before anybody says it, if it's hot get a cool bag, if it's cold take a flask with hot soup.

I cannot disagree with that, the problem is the perception of those who do not understand the implications of these systems, don't read the small print, then sell a service which has no guarantees. The end users perception, and sometimes installers perception from the marketing by the manufacturer is that it will work all of the time. Some truth around the limitations would i am sure go a long way to managing these expectations

That's all your getting

But we don't say tough we fix things Teehee

It will, i read the T&C's for the cloud, it basically says if it does not work tough. Kinda of what I expected.

Lol

Report them to NSI, they should make them take it down, plain wrong

I had forgotten it, now you have reminded me again

I now have a horrible image of Matt in a gold tracksuit, beany cap and sunglasses