[Invasion Of Ip Cameras]

James, as I always say, my English is bad, but the forum is great. Sorry again if I did not express myself well. 

It is possible to hack into a CCTV system without knowing the password of the router or IP cameras?

[Invasion Of Ip Cameras]

Hello everybody. As always, sorry for bad english. 

Today, a friend (who has a CCTV system in your company) said that a few days ago had managed to view the cameras from another company on your smartphone. According to him, the company that provides the tracking service, reported to be a problem when using the same model of DVR. That may have been a conflict of IPs, or something ... honestly, looks like an attempted invasion. It is very easy to break into a network and view the IP or analog cameras within the same network?

[Control Panel Vs Dtmf Commands]

No. In fact it seems to me is the phone company, because regardless of the device used, the commands are only accepted when the line is the same phone company.

[Control Panel Vs Dtmf Commands]

Hello James. I tested with two different cell phones, and only when calls are made ​​by the company "A" have success in all attempts. When using other, independent of the device, not always the panel understands the codes.

[Control Panel Vs Dtmf Commands]

Hello to all. I installed a control panel that accepts commands via phone (DTMF), but since last week, she has had trouble accepting commands. When the connection is made by a conventional phone in just 50% of attempts to understand the central command. Already when performed by a mobile phone, with the phone company "A" with success in 75% of attempts, and another (B) in almost 100%. DTMF codes are generated by the device or the phone company? Anyway, the panel is under warranty, but I want to make sure that is a defect before changing. 

 

PS: sorry for my bad english.

[Rokonet Vs Texecom]

Thank you all. I chose the RK815.

[Rokonet Vs Texecom]

Guys, thanks for the help. Reading an information about Texecon, found the information "pulse counter", what is it?

[Rokonet Vs Texecom]

Yes, it is also important. In fact, not only protects these ACT camouflage, but also an ambient temperature close to the human body. In addition to motion detectors, seismic be used (impact).

[Rokonet Vs Texecom]

Thanks, Six.

The place where I will install is high risk (jewelry). I've read the manual available on the Rokonet site but I can not understand if all Iwise have ACT or just a few.

[Rokonet Vs Texecom]

Six, you say the technology or the brand 'ACT'? No other manufacturer has the technology that detects the use of covers or umbrellas?

[Rokonet Vs Texecom]

Hello everyone, first of all, sorry for my bad english. 

I'm in doubt between two sensor models: Rokonet RK815DTAMG3 and Texecom AMDT. The Texecom has the ACT (Anti covers, umbrella) technology or just anti-mask? Thank you.