Jump to content
Security Installer Community

BveshPatel

Member
  • Posts

    27
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Location

  • Location
    London

BveshPatel's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

0

Reputation

  1. Would it matter if the contacts do not have a specific tamper terminal? I am using the CQR 1 Reed 5 Terminal Surface Contact Grade 1
  2. There maybe a little bit of a confusion here. It's not multiple FSL but rather two contacts on a single zone is using FSL/EOL where the last contact has the 2k2 resistor in and the first contact only has a 4k7 resistor.
  3. This topic maybe exhausted but I couldn't find s definite answer hence why I am asking the question ; On a scantronic 9651, software version 4 can you have multiple magnetic door contacts on the same zone using FSL? I have currently tried this however I am getting tamper each time a contact is opened and wondered what could be the cause as I have tripled checked the terminations and can't seem to find the fault. I am able to exit engineers mode without any tamper however when a contact is opened it goes directly into tamper, however if I have just one contact connected it works fine. I am using 4k7 for alarm and 2k2 for tamper.
  4. Hi, Just wondered if anyone has installed a pyronix Enforcer by the internal front door? Thanks
  5. Not sure what to make of this but batteries replaced and tamper faults are recognised by the panel however not if they are removed from their position I.e you can remove the battery and take the pir off the wall and the system would be none the wiser. However as its a new battery if you were to open up the pir it would go into temper
  6. Thanks I'll re-learn the devices when the batteries are replaced and report back with my findings.
  7. Thanks for the explanation. Am guessing that means that on my current alarm system it doesn't poll and therefore doesn't recognise that there are two detectors missing hence why the alarm can still be set and they can be removed without the system recognising there is a fault. Also just to confirm this is also the reason they didn't go into tamper when I opened them up to remove the battery. Would I be able to program them for tamper as well as Final Exit and Entry route once I replace the batteries by asking the RXF08 to re learn the devices?
  8. Thank you for your reply. The contacts do work on normal alarm. The Door Contact used as Final Exit and the PIR is on Entry route. Currently I have removed batteries from both as they were low and I need to replace them, however I am still able to set the the alarm without them which is making me wonder why that is as I have changed nothing in the programming?
  9. Hi All Control Panel 9751EN Keypad 9943 Prox Wireless Expander RFX08 PIR Scantronic 714r Passive Infrared Detector and Transmitter x4 Door Contact Scantronic / 734r Wireless Door Contact x2 Does anyone know why the tamper fault wouldn't be activated when I remove the lid from a PIR and a door contact.
  10. RT @motivational: It is far better to know our own weaknesses and failings than to point out those of another. -Jawaharlal Nehru

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.