Jump to content
Security Installer Community

Ssaib Company Not Registered Displaying Logos


Recommended Posts

This company is undoubtedly a rougue trader and all im begining to see is that a bit of cash and the inspectorate may forgive them the fact they take the Pss

time will tell, however it will be very interesting to see what the long term effects of the other absent approvals exposed by TSI posters have regarding DPR is any of the bodies going to do anything to protect their trademarks ?

Mr? Veritas God

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 254
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I meant to say may I thank you to long timer for his comments

Oxo will be fine :D

Christ its paul

Yep, your call.

Well said Paul & welcome back : Andy

Thanks mate

Nice to see you here BTW

And to you mate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shaun, whilst to the untrained eye the forum may be thought to contain anonymous posters, it ain't "Jim"

:lol:

And doesn't that just make a complete mockery of the comments by the the numpty claiming to be the Marketing Director.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DPR need to understand that the security industry is based around trust, and as such those that work in this industry will not stand by and watch dishonest people come along and abuse the system for those of us that have worked honestly and dammed hard

I would like to think that DPR have learnt a lesson from this experience, however, I see little evidence that they have. And if what they say about the discussions with SSAIB is true (And I sincerly hope that its not) I see little evidence that SSAIB have learnt anything from it either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.fmb.org.u...er/default.aspx

TRUSTMARK approved for the installation of security/alarm systems

:closed:

Currently what I assume to be your very recent inclusion within the Trustmark scheme is yet to filter though onto the Trustmark website

This are the results showing for Security Systems nearest DPR's postcode

post-17668-0-46245400-1344084407_thumb.j

I would expect the more prudent member will look sometime during the week to confirm what scope is listed for your trustmark

Mr? Veritas God

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Currently what I assume to be your very recent inclusion within the Trustmark scheme is yet to filter though onto the Trustmark website

This are the results showing for Security Systems nearest DPR's postcode

post-17668-0-46245400-1344084407_thumb.j

I would expect the more prudent member will look sometime during the week to confirm what scope is listed for your trustmark

You couldn't make this up, you really couldn't.

What a bunch of shysters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Following on from the DPR Ding Dong, which started on the 26/7/12,The trutmark site is now showing

post-17668-0-09122700-1344894004_thumb.j

which is 6th working day since the FMB showed them as trust mark, anybody know why the FMB is allowed to award a trustmark for security systems ? IMHO it would appear to be quite rib tickler if the ECA where awarding trustmarks for Damp proofing ?

Mr? Veritas God

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what do you know h?

nothing,

but I do suspect they asked the FMB to add the trustmark to there FMB status after being exposed on popular internet security forum, after all I think there is no extra free to pay ?

new topic in trade as I'd have to unlock the public one which is still on the 1st page of google for "dpr secure" however I guess this could be merged onto if needed ?

Mr? Veritas God

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm more interested in finding about how Builders, Roofers, Damp Treatment Specialist & Security Alarm Engineers can be tustmarked from the samebody. I guess its little more than tick what you fancy on the application & we'll slap it on the web for you ?

Any of the members know any better ?

Mr? Veritas God

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Happy is right, and ssaib and nsi should investigate and have trustbollox removed.

It gives gp the image that they are approved/inspected to a decent standard.

I really can't be ar**** with it anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Happy is right, and ssaib and nsi should investigate and have trustbollox removed.

It gives gp the image that they are approved/inspected to a decent standard.

I doubt they can do much about it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always though of trust mark as another one of those badges people collect when they can't get proper approval.

FSA (ECA),

FMB

Diversity (sadly not BGT street dancers)

All IMHO, with all to do with the security industry

Mr? Veritas God

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.