ZodiacSecurity Posted October 30, 2008 Share Posted October 30, 2008 which ones do you use / recommend or do you avoid at all costs? we currently use risco for our pet detectors and generally find them ok Burglar alarm installers | cctv installers | Access control system installers | wirefree burglar alarm installers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alterEGO Posted October 30, 2008 Share Posted October 30, 2008 which ones do you use / recommend or do you avoid at all costs?we currently use risco for our pet detectors and generally find them ok their rokonet pet pirs that go by the same name as your company are ok, but i try and design them out using shocks and limiting the rooms the pets have access to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james.wilson Posted October 30, 2008 Share Posted October 30, 2008 agree with alterego Prefer perimeter but if no choice then bosch securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A-G Posted October 30, 2008 Share Posted October 30, 2008 Visonic or Bosch depending on what fixing arrangement we need . . . PM me for access to the SSAIB members discussion area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hpotter Posted October 30, 2008 Share Posted October 30, 2008 Optex are ok. We've tried several makes, but with all it's down to location & height and you cant always put it where it needs to be. Agreed. Shocks & restrictions are the better option if possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adi Posted October 30, 2008 Share Posted October 30, 2008 visonic next k9-85. Bosch and risco ones are good to. I really can't be ar**** with it anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZodiacSecurity Posted October 30, 2008 Author Share Posted October 30, 2008 i've always found with the visonic range of pet detectors that they generally go to sleep and respond very slowly / if at all has this improved in the last few years? Burglar alarm installers | cctv installers | Access control system installers | wirefree burglar alarm installers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest anguscanplay Posted October 30, 2008 Share Posted October 30, 2008 i've always found with the visonic range of pet detectors that they generally go to sleep and respond very slowly / if at allhas this improved in the last few years? yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adi Posted October 31, 2008 Share Posted October 31, 2008 Yes I really can't be ar**** with it anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arfur mo Posted November 1, 2008 Share Posted November 1, 2008 tends to be several competative views on this, depends on the enviorments and value of posible loss the detction is to be installed within. i'm not a big fan of shocks, simply because of the risk of condensation causing problems or some idiot caller tspping on the window because they can't accept you out. if you do use shocks try to get them at least above the 1/2 wayline on the window. rokonet pets are fine in my book, our 10 stone dotty rotty never trips them, sites with cats and or dogs have not reported any problems, and not as slow as some i've tried at detecting people. your best to read the enclosed instructions for the unit BEORE you fit it, then you will be more likely to be ok. if your not sure about a particular location then test it out by using a legnth of cable as a fly lead, and mount the detector with some blue tak. walk test and pet test and if all ok instal it properly. only a short duration proceedure, but this way you will make less damage to the decorations if you then decide to move it - and have more time for the pub operatic societey : regs alan If you think education is difficult, try being stupid!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.