They are not obliged to send you the phot's unless you plead not guilty and elect a court appearance, the you will get them with the evidence pack in due course.
You can aslk them for the photo to assist you in identifying the driver but they are not obliged to divvy it up.....and clock continues to tick on the 28 day time limit to return the S172
The M6/M42 sector is notorious for this.
Yes, there is a delay but no one quite knows what it is.
Unfortunately, the onus is on you to prove you were compliant.
I take it you were pretty much on your own in the lane rather than a steady stream of flowing traffic?
Now now.
You have zero direct evidence to support that comment.
Also, how come others have little to no problem with risco kit?
Yet someone makes one post slating them and off you go.
In a word??
Boll0x
Line 2 of the dribble blows their case.
The letter is sent to the Registered Keeper - as that is the only name they can get.
At no point are you obliged to divvy up the drivers details.
Therefore, to refuse an 'appeal' if the driver is not named puts them in breach of POFA...and therefore cancels their right to rely on it.
Are we talking Parking Eye here?
And still a waste o money.I'd be telling sainsburys where to shove their business.
And by coincidence, submitted 3 'appeals' last night. I use the term appeal loosely of course as they all stated evidence was heading of to the relevant bodies informing them of the fraudulent activity.
Puts DVLA in a bit of a fix as they issued data when the scammer was breaching the Kadoe contract. Naughty naughty.
I wonder what the legal department of a certain grocery store will make of it.
never said they did and never said it was.Simply alluding to the fact it happens more than it should.
That said, the propeies of that cable means you can't say it isn't the cause - without testing.