Problem With Door Contacts With Scantronic Ion 40 Panel
#1
Posted 16 January 2012 - 03:15 PM
Contacts: CQR FC508
Hi all,
I have the above alarm system installed in a new build. I'm having real problems with one door which has two contacts installed as an FSL system. The door has two contacts as it is a barn style door split in the middle and I therefore wanted to protect both parts of the door. The system worked fine for several months but then I was unable to arm as the door was reporting being open. I checked the gap on the contacts and even moved them closer. After playing about with some spare magnets I managed to get the system working again. I'm assuming the contacts were stuck in the open position. However the problem happened again a few weeks later. I had initially used the on board resistors inside each contact and therefore decided to try using separate resistors which I installed at the panel end. This seemed to work and again all was well for several weeks. Then the problem happened again. I checked all wiring but couldn't get the contacts to work. I decided to eliminate one contact and simply use a single contact on the door. This seemed to work for a while but the problem has returned again. I'm now at a loss to explain this behaviour. I even tried changing contacts and wiring to a different zone. Same result. I also have another door with two contacts wired in the same way but these have been fine. However the second set of doors are not used often whereas the problem door is in continual use.
Anyone suggest whether this is a contact problem or could it be the panel? The fact the panel is working with oth wired contacts would suggest the door contacts at fault. Can anyone suggest another make of contacts to try?
Thanks for any help.
#2
Posted 16 January 2012 - 05:04 PM
If there not perfectly in line or the magnets are the wrong orientation, they can cause intermittant problems.
Also is the door well fitting? Is the gap too big?
#3
Posted 16 January 2012 - 05:36 PM
#4
Posted 27 January 2012 - 04:42 PM
Also you shouldnt have your resistors in the panel.
#5
Posted 29 January 2012 - 08:44 PM
I'll change both contacts but not sure which ones to go for. Have double checked the gaps and they are definitely close enough. I emailed the contact manufacturer CQR and they said the contact might be struggling due to interference from the uPVC door. They asked if there was a spacer between the contact and the door frame which there isn't. They suggested trying a different contact.
Any suggestions on a replacement?
On the subject on not using resistors in the panel, this is the opposite advice of Cooper Security who's technical advisor said the opposite and NOT to use the onboard resistors. He said you should always install the resistors at the panel end.
Edited by andyh747, 29 January 2012 - 08:45 PM.
#6
Posted 29 January 2012 - 10:10 PM
What have you got currently. Id recommend elmdene contacts but use the built in resistors
#7
Posted 29 January 2012 - 10:20 PM
Anyway I can change this easily so not a problem. Elmdene contacts look similar to CQR. Looking at their website the most suitable for FSL connection to double doors is either the 6QFC or the 6FM2. Only drawback I can see compared to the CQR one is the lack of a tamper circuit. Those with a tamper circuit aren't suitable for double doors as far as I can see.
#8
Posted 29 January 2012 - 10:39 PM
Tamper circuit wont make a difference on single or double doors.
ALso the instructions detail how to wire a double contact onto one circuit using the resistors
#9
Posted 29 January 2012 - 10:48 PM
the fsl contacts with internaal resistors will be suitable if you can remove the 2k2 one from one of em, otherwise you are correct
Edited by fozzies, 29 January 2012 - 10:51 PM.
#10
Posted 29 January 2012 - 10:50 PM
Any preference between the two contacts from Elmdene above? Ideally the 6QFC would be better as they are the same size as the CQR ones. However it wouldn't be a problem to fit the larger ones.
#11
Posted 29 January 2012 - 10:53 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













