Custody Suites
#1
Posted 05 September 2010 - 12:28 PM
As i understand it recording in them has to be kept for 90days max to comply with dpa/hra?
Who has access to the footage?
Can gp ask for footage copy as per say gp can in shop?
Is mirror recording (and presume off site?) mandatory or maybe rule of thumb, or is this Just for say gp area cams where say terrorist may attack?
Assume audio with lip sync on all cams in suite?
Assume real time recording all cams, no motion detection?
What criteria for lens/cam choice ie of the identify/recognise/detect/monitor choices whats the general rule for say, cells, or corridors?
anyway the footage
http://www.bbc.co.uk...tshire-11190561
#2
Posted 05 September 2010 - 01:48 PM
hpotter, on 05 September 2010 - 12:28 PM, said:
don't work..... but this did
http://i.dailymail.c...ideo/police.mov
read it in the mail this morning,
twenty mins of being booked in, then dragged though recption from different direction, fella from the goonies leaves the desk 1hr 20 mins after after we 1st see her 3 mins later see's bundled in the cell, when where in the cell the play back is on super slow 30 sec's or so of bleeding (nose?) took minutes to watch,
I'd rather society be policed by a 6ft3 ex squadie than plastics ?
#3
Posted 05 September 2010 - 01:53 PM
Seen it first hand. Fckers, the lot of 'em.
#4
Posted 05 September 2010 - 01:55 PM
MrHappy, on 05 September 2010 - 01:48 PM, said:
http://i.dailymail.c...ideo/police.mov
read it in the mail this morning,
twenty mins of being booked in, then dragged though recption from different direction, fella from the goonies leaves the desk 1hr 20 mins after after we 1st see her 3 mins later see's bundled in the cell, when where in the cell the play back is on super slow 30 sec's or so of bleeding (nose?) took minutes to watch,
I'd rather society be policed by a 6ft3 ex squadie than plastics ?
#5
Posted 05 September 2010 - 02:01 PM
norman, on 05 September 2010 - 01:55 PM, said:
..then probably released on appeal!!!
#6
Posted 05 September 2010 - 02:14 PM
MrHappy, on 05 September 2010 - 01:48 PM, said:
does for me on ie.
Anyway any info?
hpotter, on 05 September 2010 - 12:28 PM, said:
Who has access to the footage?
Can gp ask for footage copy as per say gp can in shop?
Is mirror recording (and presume off site?) mandatory or maybe rule of thumb, or is this Just for say gp area cams where say terrorist may attack?
Assume audio with lip sync on all cams in suite?
Assume real time recording all cams, no motion detection?
What criteria for lens/cam choice ie of the identify/recognise/detect/monitor choices whats the general rule for say, cells, or corridors?
#7
Posted 05 September 2010 - 02:19 PM
As that's only recommended could be as long as they (the client) likes.
Who or whom can view? They have to be designated with security measures to keep others out, these people would be management usually.
Camera selection I'd go D1 on this also link any assistance alarms to dvr emergency record. Not dine a custody suit but have done the interview rooms in probation offices, like type if requirements.
Edited by arfur mo, 05 September 2010 - 02:21 PM.
#8
Posted 05 September 2010 - 02:50 PM
Cubit, on 05 September 2010 - 02:01 PM, said:
..then probably released on appeal!!!
#9
Posted 05 September 2010 - 03:23 PM
norman, on 05 September 2010 - 02:50 PM, said:
I would be very interested to see how & why she's outside the cell I assume being shoved back in ?
(Theres 35 mins of footage of being dragged though repection & appearing in the cell we've not seen?)
#10
Posted 05 September 2010 - 03:48 PM
norman, on 05 September 2010 - 01:55 PM, said:
#11
Posted 05 September 2010 - 04:54 PM
#12
Posted 05 September 2010 - 05:03 PM
hope the ****** gets six months a #### up the #### on a daily basis
#13
Posted 05 September 2010 - 05:08 PM
Adi, on 05 September 2010 - 05:03 PM, said:
hope the ****** gets six months a #### up the #### on a daily basis
Probably end up on the block on rule 43, would'nt put him in with all those bad people would they
#15
Posted 05 September 2010 - 05:56 PM
maybe I'm being naive but there something missing about this story ?
#16
Posted 05 September 2010 - 05:58 PM
#17
Posted 05 September 2010 - 05:58 PM
MrHappy, on 05 September 2010 - 05:56 PM, said:
maybe I'm being naive but there something missing about this story ?
Something not quite right about it, i agree.
But his behaviour was bang out of order.
#18
Posted 05 September 2010 - 05:59 PM
The 'serious offence' was not wearing his seat belt.
Thuggery is rife as that guy bowled over by riot policeman - who got away with it, plain simple and filmed
she is lucky to be alive at least!
Arfur
#19
Posted 05 September 2010 - 06:05 PM
#20
Posted 05 September 2010 - 06:06 PM
Thats it
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















