Jump to content


Pd6662, Bs8243 And Dd263 Are Complete


29 replies to this topic

#21 Guest_Oxo_*

  • Guests

Posted 13 August 2010 - 08:07 PM

I think the wording has been changed for the sake of it, in fact as inferred it could now be over 21days and not be in contravention of the guidelines.
All down to interpretation again methinks.

#22 IAS

    Member ++++

  • Trade Full Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 999 posts

Posted 13 August 2010 - 08:07 PM

View PostCubit, on 13 August 2010 - 08:02 PM, said:

How?


try "I`ll leave that after all I`ve got 21 days ..............."

#23 arfur mo

    Elite Member ++

  • Trade Full Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,928 posts

Posted 13 August 2010 - 08:10 PM

so why and what grounds post this drivel then?

View PostIAS, on 13 August 2010 - 03:37 PM, said:

the whole industry is wrong, Alan Taylor is correct.

I should have known better.

i'm simply posting my opinion, to which you don't agree - SO WHAT?

i'm not dictating to anyone

Arfur
Those are my principles, and if you don't like them...well I have others

#24 Cubit

    Super Member +

  • Trade Full Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,831 posts

Posted 13 August 2010 - 08:14 PM

View PostIAS, on 13 August 2010 - 08:07 PM, said:

try "I`ll leave that after all I`ve got 21 days ..............."
True, but that applies equally to new wording.
"Bother!" said Pooh, as he found his smack had talc in it.

#25 arfur mo

    Elite Member ++

  • Trade Full Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,928 posts

Posted 13 August 2010 - 08:15 PM

View Postjameswilson, on 13 August 2010 - 06:21 PM, said:

I'd agree the time limit is now tighter under most circumstances.

I'd agree the time limit is now tighter under most circumstances.

x2 ! - are you in into the mantra menopause?

21 days is an easily defined and enforceable limit, so how on earth can it be tighter than '"as practicable"?

Arfur
Those are my principles, and if you don't like them...well I have others

#26 jb-eye

    Super Member +

  • Trade Full Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,659 posts

Posted 13 August 2010 - 08:18 PM

View PostOxo, on 13 August 2010 - 08:07 PM, said:

I think the wording has been changed for the sake of it, in fact as inferred it could now be over 21days and not be in contravention of the guidelines.
All down to interpretation again methinks.
agreed. now i can go away for a month and not worry LOL
Customers!

#27 Guest_Oxo_*

  • Guests

Posted 13 August 2010 - 08:23 PM

Sure its not you getting these additions/changes done Jeff :D

#28 IAS

    Member ++++

  • Trade Full Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 999 posts

Posted 13 August 2010 - 08:30 PM

View PostCubit, on 13 August 2010 - 08:14 PM, said:

True, but that applies equally to new wording.



and which variant do you think the inspectors will choose?

#29 arfur mo

    Elite Member ++

  • Trade Full Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,928 posts

Posted 13 August 2010 - 09:45 PM

View PostIAS, on 13 August 2010 - 08:30 PM, said:

and which variant do you think the inspectors will choose?

whatever causes them least paperwork

Arfur
Those are my principles, and if you don't like them...well I have others

#30 Guest_Oxo_*

  • Guests

Posted 13 August 2010 - 09:56 PM

View Postarfur mo, on 13 August 2010 - 09:45 PM, said:

whatever causes them least paperwork

Arfur


Trouble is, they thrive on the paperwork.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users