Pd6662, Bs8243 And Dd263 Are Complete
Started by jameswilson, May 18 2010 05:28 PM
29 replies to this topic
#21 Guest_Oxo_*
Posted 13 August 2010 - 08:07 PM
I think the wording has been changed for the sake of it, in fact as inferred it could now be over 21days and not be in contravention of the guidelines.
All down to interpretation again methinks.
All down to interpretation again methinks.
#23
Posted 13 August 2010 - 08:10 PM
so why and what grounds post this drivel then?
i'm simply posting my opinion, to which you don't agree - SO WHAT?
i'm not dictating to anyone
Arfur
IAS, on 13 August 2010 - 03:37 PM, said:
the whole industry is wrong, Alan Taylor is correct.
I should have known better.
I should have known better.
i'm not dictating to anyone
Arfur
Those are my principles, and if you don't like them...well I have others
#25
Posted 13 August 2010 - 08:15 PM
jameswilson, on 13 August 2010 - 06:21 PM, said:
I'd agree the time limit is now tighter under most circumstances.
I'd agree the time limit is now tighter under most circumstances.
I'd agree the time limit is now tighter under most circumstances.
x2 ! - are you in into the mantra menopause?
21 days is an easily defined and enforceable limit, so how on earth can it be tighter than '"as practicable"?
Arfur
Those are my principles, and if you don't like them...well I have others
#26
Posted 13 August 2010 - 08:18 PM
Oxo, on 13 August 2010 - 08:07 PM, said:
I think the wording has been changed for the sake of it, in fact as inferred it could now be over 21days and not be in contravention of the guidelines.
All down to interpretation again methinks.
All down to interpretation again methinks.
Customers!
#27 Guest_Oxo_*
Posted 13 August 2010 - 08:23 PM
Sure its not you getting these additions/changes done Jeff
#30 Guest_Oxo_*
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















