kensplace Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 What if someone leaves a light on, goes to bed, the bulb blows, circuit trips - smokes without battery backup if on that light circuit would then be dead until you wake up and reset the breaker. If there is a fire during the night, the smokes would not alert you in those circumstances... Kids often leave the lights on, bulbs are always blowing in our house, and it trips the breaker every time one blows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james.wilson Posted August 28, 2008 Share Posted August 28, 2008 they are battery backed so in that situation they would function and alert that the mains was off. securitywarehouse Security Supplies from Security Warehouse Trade Members please contact us for your TSI vetted trade discount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NitroN Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 In SA, we are regulated by Fire standards, but these generally do not include a private house, as these are not normally required to have smoke detection. I disagree that a battery powered smoke detector is as effective as a 12volt smoke detector connected to an alarm panel. While it is preferable to install a fire system, this adds costs. In terms of different sounds from the same siren, most panels have programmable output, which can trigger a dedicated bell, a sound bomb/piezo siren or other visual or audible indicators for a fire alarm. As mentioned in this forum, I have also heard many stories of battery operated smokes, without batteries, as these have been removed to power other irrelevant devices. I am not sure of the UK regs regarding smoke detectors or how the inspectors enforce them, but I do believe in smoke detectors, battery only least, then alarm connected, then fire alarm, in that order of priority. In the US apparently a new reg states that smokes must be interconnected in a house. Smokes should always be connected on a dedicated smoke/fire zone, be wired correctly, programmed correctly, and have sufficient battery backup. Regards NitroN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
galaxyclass Posted September 26, 2008 Share Posted September 26, 2008 I personally prefer fire detectors connected to the intruder system, (if you have a decent panel that is). i have a keypad next to my bed so that when a detector operates i know where the fire is (each fire detector on seperate zone) i use a seperate fire output to trigger GSM communicator and another plus point is i have never had a false activation ( i use hochiki conventional on conversion base plus a co2 in living room. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chorlton Posted September 26, 2008 Share Posted September 26, 2008 I personally prefer fire detectors connected to the intruder system, (if you have a decent panel that is).i have a keypad next to my bed so that when a detector operates i know where the fire is (each fire detector on seperate zone) i use a seperate fire output to trigger GSM communicator and another plus point is i have never had a false activation ( i use hochiki conventional on conversion base plus a co2 in living room. now thats home safety Available by PM for Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
galaxyclass Posted September 26, 2008 Share Posted September 26, 2008 LOL, whoops ok CO detector. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cathexsis Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 I'd fit smokes/heats to the alarm via a dialler personally. I fitted both in my own house, 240volt ones are too sensitive and sometimes trigger when making din din. Never have had a false alarm off alarm smokes/heats, they also give u peace of mind if your away from home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adi Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 Your fa's would have come from ionisation smokes, if opticals were fitted, doubt you would of had a problem. Bet your intruder smokes are optical. I really can't be ar**** with it anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cubit Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 Your fa's would have come from ionisation smokes, if opticals were fitted, doubt you would of had a problem. Bet your intruder smokes are optical. You might want to check the dates on this thread adi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CerbNI Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 You might want to check the dates on this thread adi. Ah,but Adi was responding to another post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.